GSquared (9/15/2011)

---

Ninja's_RGR'us (9/15/2011)

---

Much better than what I could have done without someone proof reading....

SOMETHING changed. There's no luck in unchanging code ;-).

Much better than what I could have done without someone proof reading. I...

The difference is in # of page read, hence also ram + cpu + disks.

The difference might be minimal or very noticable depending on what type of queries you are...

Can't because I've never seen a system like that.

Any way to figure out how many types of meters you have and merge all those in the same table?

That way I...

Resender (9/15/2011)

---

It's very strange, if I make any change (that either adding new graph, dataset or making an alteration to the query) the data get loaded completly.

Without that it seems...

Anybody got deep-ish cardinality / index / stats knowledge?

Not my forte!

http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1174681-338-1.aspx

Too deep for me. I'll see if I can ping in someone.

There are 2 urls. Check the 2nd in the report setup tool.

Of course you'll need to deploy a few reprots before you see anything more than the home folder...

I believe you 100%. I just got no effing idea of what's wrong here.

thiyagarajann (9/15/2011)

---

Hi,

I agree that , shrink is not recommended everytime. But in my case, I used to have million levels of records in tables. All the procedure will have DELETE...

As I said earlier there's no point in saving that history. It's readily available in the backup tables. That's why I can use the whole script to see...

Another reason why I strongly bother to...

SQLRNNR (9/14/2011)

---

Grant Fritchey (9/14/2011)

---

Changing the topic for a moment, I'd like to beg some ideas from the group, again.

I'm tasked with writing another article. This one is all about the...

Agreed, but this is getting more on "advanced" tuning.

I am under...