Viewing 15 posts - 16,681 through 16,695 (of 18,926 total)
why not?? it's only 190k rows... and the heart of the site
.
June 15, 2005 at 11:55 pm
Just take yours and we'll trust what comes up... and agrees with common physics laws
.
June 15, 2005 at 11:54 pm
There must be a message somewhere... But I can't think were it could be.
June 15, 2005 at 2:23 pm
I see. Thanx for the info.
June 15, 2005 at 2:11 pm
Don't know about that fix in SP4.
What error message are you getting when trying to reactivate the constraints?
June 15, 2005 at 2:09 pm
I don't see an easy way out right now... seems to me that you'll need more than one query to pull this out (or a big bunch of left joins).
Seems...
June 15, 2005 at 2:08 pm
That was my reference to the snapshot (copy sysobjects into a table, then at next run check to see differences between the 2 tables). Both you'd have to log,...
June 15, 2005 at 2:06 pm
Maybe something like this?? : http://www.sqlservercentral.com/scripts/contributions/721.asp
June 15, 2005 at 1:56 pm
Here's a working exemple. The data makes no sens but at least the query works :
Select * from NorthWind.dbo.SysObjects O inner join Pubs.dbo.SysColumns C on O.id = C.id
June 15, 2005 at 1:54 pm
Can we see the procedure and see what it's really about?
June 15, 2005 at 1:52 pm
ALTER TABLE at_plPlatted_Lot NOCHECK CONSTRAINT all
and
ALTER TABLE at_plPlatted_Lot CHECK CONSTRAINT all
Only deactivate and reactivates the constraints. It doesn't revalidate anything.
Do you have to do this on many tables??
Have you...
June 15, 2005 at 1:51 pm
Are you talking about versions of stored procs/tables??
Cause this is something that is really better handled by carefully planed releases and code versionning kept in history. The only way...
June 15, 2005 at 1:47 pm
NP... can't wait to hear the answer of my last message
.
June 15, 2005 at 1:44 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 16,681 through 16,695 (of 18,926 total)