Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 1,584 total)
Verified that the strip-size is 64k.
I think for the next few days I am going to try running it as a RAID 5, then move things around, redo the array...
November 16, 2012 at 7:51 am
8KB random read and write - 90% read, 10% write ratio
TOT IO/sec: 2245.5
Total MB/sec: 17.6
Average IO Response Time: 7.22
MAX IO Response 153.3
CPU: 30.9
64KB sequential read and write - 90% read,...
November 16, 2012 at 6:26 am
Perry Whittle (11/16/2012)
Despite the advances in RAID5 i would expect a well defined RAID10 array to have superior write performance. I'm sure others will jump in here.
You've mentioned this before...
November 16, 2012 at 6:14 am
Again as mentioned above this storage array will only be used for data and index files (NO log or tempdb files)
November 16, 2012 at 5:45 am
Sorry, I did mean SQLIO - but for these tests I am only using IOMeter.
Results below for RAID 5
MAX IOPS - uses 4KB transfer request size, 100% reads, 100% sequential...
November 15, 2012 at 7:59 pm
Well this depends...Can you use a linked server? If so, it's quite simple
EXECUTE [YOURSERVER].msdb.dbo.sp_start_job 'TESTJOB'
November 15, 2012 at 7:46 pm
Running some tests using IOMeter (preferred the GUI to this one over SQLIOsim) and using some of the predefined options here's the results:
ON a 12-disk, RAID 5, 1 hot-swappable spare,...
November 15, 2012 at 3:32 pm
Yes, this is the option I am going with first (lumping all disks into a single RAID 5 array). I believe keeping one as a hot spare leaves me...
November 15, 2012 at 12:30 pm
Another quick note on what Charles has offered:
Depending on how many rows these "mini" queries will yield and if you have a beefy server with ample RAM, consider using parameter...
November 14, 2012 at 1:55 pm
Please supply the execution plan for this exact query
"I know this is a bad query but I don't know why"
Press Ctrl-"M" before running the query, then when it completes you...
November 14, 2012 at 11:20 am
I spoke with our Tech Services guy and he said there'd be no issue using a RAID5 with 12 disks, it would give us ample space and yield 11 available...
November 14, 2012 at 10:40 am
That should work.
Was thinking to place the 12-disks into one large RAID 5 (so that should leave me with 11 spindles) - I will place Data files and Index files...
November 12, 2012 at 4:50 pm
90% reads, 10% writes...
Reading a couple of chapters from the link you posted pretty much narrows things down to a RAID5 or 10 (which is pretty much were I got...
November 12, 2012 at 11:43 am
Just out of curiosity, how much data is being replicated? Please describe your architecture...for instance, how many articles are in the publication? When you created your publication, what options did...
November 9, 2012 at 6:54 pm
I've seen this issue when attempting to obtain and execution plan from a procedure that had a cursor/loop in it and it have to process a set of statements several...
November 9, 2012 at 11:45 am
Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 1,584 total)