Viewing 15 posts - 751 through 765 (of 1,241 total)
Just a quick note I found on Books Online :
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms177570.aspx
Have a look at the bottom section named restrictions. I see a mention of replication, might this apply to your...
April 8, 2015 at 5:25 pm
Part of the answer to this question is how many tables and /or columns to existing tables you think could be added? You multiply the size per one row times...
April 6, 2015 at 10:14 pm
Eirikur Eiriksson (4/6/2015)
koti.raavi (4/5/2015)
Please see below query
Select ID, ID1,Name, Cname from Customer where ID =(@IDSearch) or ID1 =(@Idsearch)
When i run above query took around 3...
April 6, 2015 at 10:07 pm
I have also heard the terms 'ansi' and 'ascii' used interchangeably. If that is what you mean then the simple answer is that unicode text starts with a "N" in...
April 6, 2015 at 10:00 pm
I hope I am understanding your question. Combine the results of the sql provided above with the information presented here :
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb177899%28v=office.12%29.aspx
April 6, 2015 at 9:54 pm
I would recommend to use the registry to store a password though the configuration manager. It's a good practice so that the text is not exposed in a file or...
March 27, 2015 at 6:45 pm
Enjoy_SQL (3/20/2015)
March 21, 2015 at 2:10 pm
Enjoy_SQL (3/16/2015)
What I am finding out now (and someone mentioned before with caution :)) is that any...
March 16, 2015 at 10:23 am
Thanks for posting back. Glad to know this worked out and we were able to help.
March 13, 2015 at 11:09 am
The link posted by Sean explains the conditions under which a view is update-able. If the latest DDL you posted is any indication, you are working with one base table....
March 12, 2015 at 2:32 pm
Most certainly it is possible. Especially if you are basing your view directly on one physical table.
March 12, 2015 at 12:57 pm
I'd stear clear of joining a local table with a remote table using 4 part naming convention. This type of cross-instance joining is not efficient for a number of reasons,...
March 11, 2015 at 6:40 pm
Will this work for you? It does not rely on a lag() which are not available before SQL SERVER 2012.
SELECT
T2.[WEEK] , T2.CAMPUS, T2.BUILDING, T1.[OCCUPIED SUITES] AS OCCUPIED_SUITES_WEEK_START, T2.[OCCUPIED...
March 11, 2015 at 5:12 pm
One thing I can say for the BIT type .... I can see the issues arising from not knowing the yes/no answer at time t1. So these were allowed...
March 5, 2015 at 11:41 am
Just to cover, there are no triggers firing on the destination table correct?
Also from this page https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms141237(v=sql.105).aspx
I can see where it reads "Performance can be improved if you...
March 4, 2015 at 11:05 am
Viewing 15 posts - 751 through 765 (of 1,241 total)