Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 790 total)
I actually liked this question. Not only was it a reminder to test things that BOL is ambiguous or unclear about, but it was a prompt to me to...
August 4, 2003 at 10:22 pm
I think you're out of luck trying to INSERT to multiple tables. Even if it were defined as a view it would not be an "updatable" view because of...
August 4, 2003 at 10:05 pm
Vivian,
I've seen such standards documented at various sites, but not for public consumption. Why not? Beats me.
But, one SQL organisation here in Oz called SSW has a number...
August 4, 2003 at 3:47 am
My guess is NO. Hard to find anything in BOL that states explicitly whether you can or not, but my answer is based on:
1) you can't run sp_adddistributor twice
2)...
August 3, 2003 at 6:34 pm
I think you might be expecting too much of the SQL engine. YOU know that the 20 various rows just inserted will satisfy the query you subsequently execute, but...
August 3, 2003 at 5:59 pm
Bobster,
UPDATE() doesn't need to be tested for each row, because it is true for the entire set. ie. the single- or multi-row update is fired by something like:
August 3, 2003 at 3:34 pm
oh well, scratch that theory.
anything in the setup log/s?
Cheers,
- Mark
August 3, 2003 at 3:06 pm
You're not trying to install on Win 2003 Beta, or the Web Edition are you? There's issues/restrictions with them.
Cheers,
- Mark
August 3, 2003 at 6:02 am
I think you're out of luck with BULK INSERT, whereas I believe BCP gives you the option of specifying a "discard" file.
Cheers,
- Mark
August 2, 2003 at 8:17 pm
Vivian,
Rather than capturing SP_WHO output, you could go straight into sysprocesses (like SP_WHO does anyway). The following captures all current connections from "MyPC" into a temporary table #who...
August 2, 2003 at 6:09 pm
How about:
SELECT DISTINCT ,
(SELECT TOP 1 [office] FROM UserOfficeCount WHERE = A. ORDER BY [count] DESC) [office]
FROM UserOfficeCount...
August 2, 2003 at 4:37 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 790 total)