Viewing 15 posts - 14,731 through 14,745 (of 26,486 total)
I think it's time for all of us to just abandon that thread to MasterBlaster.
I'm not going back any more.
February 12, 2011 at 7:28 pm
LutzM (2/12/2011)
Even though it might be fun arguing with a person in such a mood from time to time, there usually is a point where the discussion starts running...
February 12, 2011 at 8:02 am
Okay, I guess we are The Borg and MasterBlaster refuses to be assimulated.
Please, some one tell me how my 2nd to last post could be considered insulting. I've read...
February 11, 2011 at 9:06 pm
Nadabadan,
I'm curious what you find insulting about my post? I have reread it and don't see where I called you any names? I pointed out what I believe...
February 11, 2011 at 8:56 pm
Yes, Tom, yes I did. After reading Brandie's thoughtful response, and MasterBlasters retort, I just had to say something. I know he will now attack me as well,...
February 11, 2011 at 7:24 pm
Nadabadan,
True, Brandie may not speak for all of us, but her comments are quite valid. I do find your comments and attitude quite insulting, and displays a complete lack...
February 11, 2011 at 6:44 pm
Koen Verbeeck (2/10/2011)
GSquared (2/10/2011)
Welcome aboard!The subject of this thread has changed a bit over time...
About some 2380 pages ago 😀
Depending on how many posts per page you have set.
February 10, 2011 at 10:43 am
Well, it always better to have more than one person testing.
The testing I did used actual data at work, so I may not be able reproduce it right away. ...
February 9, 2011 at 6:21 pm
@jeff - I haven't been able to find anything as of yet, so some of this has to be taken as personal experience. What this means is that people...
February 9, 2011 at 10:07 am
ColdCoffee (2/8/2011)
mtassin (2/8/2011)
Jeff Moden (2/7/2011)
Wolfmeister (2/7/2011)
That's pretty slick! Thanks guys.Just making sure... do you understand how ColdCoffee's method works?
Heck I didn't understand what he was doing with the CTEs...
February 8, 2011 at 10:04 pm
I could, but a better way is to ask you to check out that blog I suggested. Look at the functions provided and see if you can figure out...
February 8, 2011 at 9:57 pm
lance.kentwell (2/8/2011)
SELECT DATEDIFF(s, '1970-01-01 00:00:00', (SELECT DATEADD(s,0,DATEADD(mm, DATEDIFF(m,0,getdate())-1,0))))/86400
SELECT DATEDIFF(s, '1970-01-01 00:00:00', (SELECT DATEADD(s,-1,DATEADD(mm, DATEDIFF(m,0,getdate()),0))))/86400
I also added "/86400" on the end to convert the whole tings to...
February 8, 2011 at 9:01 pm
I come up with something like this:
SELECT DATEDIFF(s, '1970-01-01 00:00:00', dateadd(mm, datediff(mm, 0, GETDATE()) - 1, 0));
February 8, 2011 at 8:58 pm
lance.kentwell (2/8/2011)
SELECT DATEADD(s,0,DATEADD(mm, DATEDIFF(m,0,getdate())-1,0))
Then I take the result and convert it to epoch time suing...
February 8, 2011 at 8:48 pm
Craig Farrell (2/8/2011)
*sighs* I've failed sainthood. I leave this gentleman in your hands, he can't even debate well, and my patience is stretching to the unprofessional realms.http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1059167-145-1.aspx
One Saint there...
February 8, 2011 at 8:38 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 14,731 through 14,745 (of 26,486 total)