Viewing 15 posts - 12,031 through 12,045 (of 26,486 total)
Well, that is all I can come up with since I can't see what you see.
May 11, 2012 at 11:33 am
Matt Miller (#4) (5/11/2012)
May 11, 2012 at 11:32 am
Probably not. I wouldn't be surprised if the times you are seeing are during the execution of the procedure. It probably uses GETDATE() in an update statement, correct?...
May 11, 2012 at 11:26 am
Sample data for your tables and the expected results would go a long way to helping you.
The sample data should be using INSERT INTO statements for the tables so that...
May 11, 2012 at 11:23 am
Tonci Korsano (5/11/2012)
here is the answer --> https://www.google.com/#hl=en&sa=X&psj=1&ei=70OtT53nCYKy8ASUwrWXDQ&ved=0CBgQvwUoAQ&q=(sqlbulkcopy+OR+bcp)+(%22no+logging%22+OR+%22does+not+log%22)&spell=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=356e729b7a15c7f0&biw=1280&bih=891
or just put in google.com
(sqlbulkcopy OR bcp) ("no logging" OR "does not log")
this is really a web search... even though it...
May 11, 2012 at 11:15 am
Not sure if this will help with parallelism, but this is how I would code the query. Also, in SQL Server 2005 the date/time data type can have a...
May 11, 2012 at 11:08 am
Can you provide the criteria for computing the start and end dates for your query? Does it always start with 10/01 of a given year?
May 11, 2012 at 10:52 am
This should work:
DECLARE @BadData TABLE(DataID INT, Data VARCHAR(50), ExpectedData VARCHAR(50));
INSERT INTO @BadData(DataID,Data,ExpectedData)
SELECT 1,'#123 data','data' UNION
SELECT 2,'#456data','data' UNION
SELECT 3,'data #789','data' UNION
SELECT 4,'data#012','data' UNION
SELECT 5,'data#345 some more data','data some more data' UNION
SELECT...
May 11, 2012 at 10:44 am
polkadot (5/11/2012)
May 11, 2012 at 9:50 am
Sean Lange (5/11/2012)
Lynn Pettis (5/11/2012)
Sean Lange (5/11/2012)
Lynn, why not the replace I posted above? It is super fast because it doesn't have to do all sorts of string manipulation.
Didn't see...
May 11, 2012 at 9:41 am
Sean Lange (5/11/2012)
Lynn, why not the replace I posted above? It is super fast because it doesn't have to do all sorts of string manipulation.
Didn't see it. Looks good...
May 11, 2012 at 9:34 am
Here is a shot at it:
DECLARE @BadData TABLE(DataID INT, Data VARCHAR(50), ExpectedData VARCHAR(50));
INSERT INTO @BadData(DataID,Data,ExpectedData)
SELECT 1,'#123 data','data' UNION
SELECT 2,'#456data','data' UNION
SELECT 3,'data #789','data' UNION
SELECT 4,'data#012','data' UNION
SELECT 5,'data#345 some more data','data some...
May 11, 2012 at 9:26 am
Jeff Moden (5/11/2012)
Lynn Pettis (5/10/2012)
Jeff Moden (5/10/2012)
So much time wasted.
Maybe, but it is my time to waste. I'm not going to apologize for hoping against hope for the best....
May 11, 2012 at 8:51 am
Have to ask, is it always a # and three digits or is that just the way you configured your sample data?
May 11, 2012 at 8:48 am
Viewing 15 posts - 12,031 through 12,045 (of 26,486 total)