You could find this out yourself just by going to Microsofts SQL Server web site.

Jeff Moden (1/17/2009)

---

Heh.. a death knell for sure... anyone remember Lotus 123 or Symphony? And, if you...

Yes, I agree. I think I had read it when it was first published as some it sounded...

Jeff Moden (1/16/2009)

---

Jeff Moden (1/13/2009)

---

I am certainly...

John Rowan (1/16/2009)

---

Lynn Pettis (1/16/2009)

---

I'd still use the datetime data type in my date dimension in my data warehouse. I'd just be sure the time portion was 00:00:00.000. ...

Jason Shadonix (1/16/2009)

---

Yes and no.

I used to work for a not-for-profit company that had SQL Server and Access, but no decent devleopment tools. (Couldn't/wouldn't pay for decent MS tools,...

The excuse I usually here is this:

hmmm, point taken. Could be good for small desktop system or workgroup solution. Think...

GSquared (1/16/2009)

---

noeld (1/16/2009)

---

There are *many* things Oracle can do that SQL Server can't. So much so, that Oracle is normally being refused because of its too many knobs....

Now that being...

I'd still use the datetime data type in my date dimension in my data warehouse. I'd just be sure the time portion was 00:00:00.000. If using SQL Server...

Right there with you. I couldn't figure out what the OP is asking either.

However, the Developers Edition is actually the Enterprise Edition with different licensing. Therefore all the features of the Enterprise Edition are available in the Developer Edition.

To be sure, not completely sure. I normally don't provide support for the front-end application. I usually keep to the SQL side of things and let those who...

PW (1/15/2009)

---

I'll take a break from gnashing my teeth & swearing at the original coder to add my common mistake:

Frequent use of DISTINCT to hide a fundamental design flaw and/or...

noeld (1/15/2009)

---

For some reason I think this...