Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 22,966 through 22,980 (of 26,490 total)

  • RE: SQL Server 2005 SP 3

    ALZDBA (1/20/2009)

    Lynn Pettis (1/7/2009)

    Okay, I will look into that tomorrow morning (well, it is almost tomorrow morning now for me) when I get into work. I'll let you know...

    January 20, 2009 at 7:22 am

    #929724

  • RE: Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins

    Joe Celko (1/19/2009)

    >> But (ONCE AGAIN JOE) this is a SQL SERVER FORUM! I guarantee you that the developers for SQL Server are way more familiar with the .NET...

    January 19, 2009 at 10:53 pm

    #929496

  • RE: Are the posted questions getting worse?

    I have my third article that I have started on. I am currently working on building the test data. Since I am working off 4 year old mental...

    January 18, 2009 at 12:03 pm

    #928948

  • RE: Restore Database Without Log

    Paresh Prajapati (1/17/2009)

    Paul Randal (1/17/2009)

    Paresh Prajapati (1/16/2009)

    Tim Riley (1/8/2009)

    I know there is, but I can't remember how...How do you go about restoring a database that has a corrupt/bad transaction log?

    Please...

    January 17, 2009 at 10:58 pm

    #928827

  • RE: SQL server 20008 and 2005

    You could find this out yourself just by going to Microsofts SQL Server web site.

    January 17, 2009 at 10:49 pm

    #928826

  • RE: SQL or Oracle

    Jeff Moden (1/17/2009)

    gints.plivna (1/17/2009)

    Informix is dead, err I mean bought by IBM on 2001 😉

    Heh.. a death knell for sure... anyone remember Lotus 123 or Symphony? And, if you...

    January 17, 2009 at 10:31 pm

    #928822

  • RE: Are the posted questions getting worse?

    RBarryYoung (1/17/2009)

    Hey, I just read it. That is a great article!

    Yes, I agree. I think I had read it when it was first published as some it sounded...

    January 17, 2009 at 4:27 pm

    #928784

  • RE: working with multiple dataset withing a table in SSRS

    Jeff Moden (1/16/2009)

    Jeff Moden (1/13/2009)

    bsrlong (1/13/2009)

    As soon As I do find a solution I will not just post a reply I will attempt to have a document available.

    I am certainly...

    January 16, 2009 at 3:46 pm

    #928573

  • RE: Indexed View ... Slow !?!?

    John Rowan (1/16/2009)

    Lynn Pettis (1/16/2009)

    I'd still use the datetime data type in my date dimension in my data warehouse. I'd just be sure the time portion was 00:00:00.000. ...

    January 16, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    #928567

  • RE: SQL or Oracle

    Jason Shadonix (1/16/2009)

    Yes and no.

    I used to work for a not-for-profit company that had SQL Server and Access, but no decent devleopment tools. (Couldn't/wouldn't pay for decent MS tools,...

    January 16, 2009 at 3:14 pm

    #928554

  • RE: Why do people need to do this?

    The excuse I usually here is this:

    It's easier to create and transfer one file instead of multiple files.

    January 16, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    #928551

  • RE: SQL or Oracle

    Jason Shadonix (1/16/2009)

    Hey! How come nobody is mentioning how good Access is!? :hehe:

    hmmm, point taken. Could be good for small desktop system or workgroup solution. Think...

    January 16, 2009 at 3:04 pm

    #928545

  • RE: SQL or Oracle

    GSquared (1/16/2009)

    noeld (1/16/2009)

    There are *many* things Oracle can do that SQL Server can't. So much so, that Oracle is normally being refused because of its too many knobs....

    Now that being...

    January 16, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    #928531

  • RE: Indexed View ... Slow !?!?

    I'd still use the datetime data type in my date dimension in my data warehouse. I'd just be sure the time portion was 00:00:00.000. If using SQL Server...

    January 16, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    #928521

  • RE: Need help to write sql statement

    Right there with you. I couldn't figure out what the OP is asking either.

    January 16, 2009 at 8:41 am

    #928218

Viewing 15 posts - 22,966 through 22,980 (of 26,490 total)