Viewing 15 posts - 4,156 through 4,170 (of 8,731 total)
I believe that the leading zero is correct and missing the zero is incorrect. That coming from the article shared by Jason.
September 22, 2015 at 6:38 am
Please post DDL and sample data to be able to test different possibilities. Be sure to post the expected results based on that sample data.
September 21, 2015 at 12:03 pm
WayneS (9/21/2015)
Alan.B (9/21/2015)
The homework assignment may dictate that the problem be solved with a cursor. Anyone who is good with cursors want to take a look at this?
Anyone good...
September 21, 2015 at 10:15 am
Why did you open this other thread for the same problem?
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1721196-391-1.aspx
It only divides the answers and multiplies the efforts of people helping in here.
September 21, 2015 at 10:12 am
You overcomplicate things, Ben. It can all be done in a single query.
This won't solve the whole problem, but it can show how it could be done.
--
-- Create a table.
--
select...
September 21, 2015 at 9:27 am
WayneS (9/21/2015)
Kristen-173977 (9/20/2015)
GilaMonster (9/19/2015)
September 21, 2015 at 9:10 am
That's easier, just remove the GROUP BY (and HAVING) clause as that's only needed if you want to exclude the job numbers that have both operation codes.
September 21, 2015 at 8:53 am
You could change your function to an iTVF (inline table valued function) which should be faster.
Something like this:
--Added an i as prefix to prevent code malfunctions where the original function...
September 21, 2015 at 8:49 am
Here's a simpler option to Scott's query that can be easily converted to the second report.
SELECT
J.DT_ID
,J.OperationCode
,J.EmployeeCode
,J.JobNumber
FROM...
September 21, 2015 at 7:55 am
You might expect that '090471' is equal to '90471' because they have the same numeric value. However, they're different strings.
Here's a code that removes leading zeros to solve this problem....
September 21, 2015 at 5:59 am
Alvin Ramard (9/18/2015)
Jack Corbett (9/18/2015)
September 18, 2015 at 2:20 pm
I completely understand, that's why I mention that it only complies with part of the requirements. However, I wanted to show a better option that will actually help in the...
September 18, 2015 at 2:18 pm
Because T-SQL doesn't like to have flow control.
Don't forget to remove THEN, this isn't VB. 😛
September 18, 2015 at 1:06 pm
Why do they keep teaching this kind of stuff? http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1720978-169-1.aspx
Then people wonder why there's crappy code everywhere.
September 18, 2015 at 1:01 pm
hyper50 (9/18/2015)
4.You must use a cursor to loop through the GRADE_CONVERSION table to find the letter grade
WHAAAAAAT????? :w00t:
That's actually the best way to return the values by using a cursor....
September 18, 2015 at 12:56 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 4,156 through 4,170 (of 8,731 total)