Viewing 15 posts - 7,066 through 7,080 (of 13,460 total)
based on this ms doc, where changing the server collation requires a rebuild:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms179254.aspx,
i'm guessing that the server collation is actually the collation of the resource database, regardless of whatever...
Lowell
July 27, 2011 at 7:04 am
is your instance an "Express" instance?
by default, an express isntance does not allow remote connections...meaning you can work just fiine locally, but nothing can connect to your machine until you...
Lowell
July 27, 2011 at 6:33 am
In addition to what Eugene said, i usually create the replacement proc under a new, temporary name,a dn test them side by side, comparing execution plans;
yoiu know exec pr_myproc @param...
Lowell
July 27, 2011 at 6:25 am
Riskworks (7/26/2011)
When I call it from another Proc I get an error saying that...
Lowell
July 27, 2011 at 6:19 am
not directly like that...you could use a scalar function instead...but before i demo that...lets review what you are trying to do...there might be a better way.
if the email address is...
Lowell
July 27, 2011 at 6:02 am
i was playing witht eh event notifications for that for a while; on a certians erver, i was trying to create a suite of roles in any database that was...
Lowell
July 26, 2011 at 1:18 pm
also, you can use a server wide DDL trigger for CREATE_DATABASE, but if the database is created new from a restore, it's not detected, for whatever reason that;s not a...
Lowell
July 26, 2011 at 1:15 pm
GilaMonster (7/26/2011)
Lowell, to be completely accurate you should sum that grouped by object_id, index_id. If the table is partitioned, there will be multiple rows in there for a single table.
As...
Lowell
July 26, 2011 at 11:50 am
i suspected what gail said, where you have to use a SELECT * FROM VIEWNAME was the only way to do rowcounts for views.
for tables, you can use the indexes...
Lowell
July 26, 2011 at 11:43 am
I've inherited situations like this as well.
this is common issue when you store datatime in a non-datetime field; sometimes you can hope implicit conversiosn will work, but the format...
Lowell
July 26, 2011 at 9:44 am
i saw that no one name was in two or more of the groups, so i'm assuming they have no relations? is that right? or should they be joined on...
Lowell
July 26, 2011 at 9:29 am
yes exactly...at the data entry level, they would actually type the value in...but the data would be processed by the stored proc, and stored in an encrypted fashion.
here's a really...
Lowell
July 26, 2011 at 8:35 am
wendy the devil is in the details;
we'd proably need to see the actual execution plan of the "new" query hitting those 9 tables to offer concrete advice;
that actual execution...
Lowell
July 26, 2011 at 8:27 am
the name timestamp column is very misleading...it's synonym of ROWVERSION is more descriptive.
change your insert to not include the timestamp column...a new value will be created for you automaticaly, just...
Lowell
July 26, 2011 at 8:23 am
typically i've used a stored procedure to do the whole CRUD operations for tables which contain encrypted values...or at least when the encryption is handled at the SQL server level.
then...
Lowell
July 26, 2011 at 8:18 am
Viewing 15 posts - 7,066 through 7,080 (of 13,460 total)