Laptop...Thumbdrive...Golf Cart...32bit...workaround...Free..."connections are only open for a second or two to retrieve a row or write a row"

a few of the keywords i'm picking up here directly telling towards the...

this is because you have a correlated subquery, mostly due to bad aliasing. it's not a bug, but a behavior that occurs when you don't code correctly. properly aliasing columns...

whoops i menat by hour and not description... changed above.

ORDER BY cte.StartDateTime,r.hour_number

if you were gettign help in another thread, you probably should have continued in that thread, instead of a new post.

looks like this would work to me:

ORDER BY cte.StartDateTime,r.hour_number

you must have an explicit ORDER BY in your query to guarantee the data appears in a specific order. you stated you have no order by, so that is the...

Rod at work (9/21/2015)

---

I hadn't thought of renaming the foreign key constraints. That's an interesting idea. However, even if I did rename the foreign key constraints they're definition would still...

you are correct, only the table would be renamed.

you can rename each of the constraints, separately, one at a time, if you wanted with sp_rename, which you had already identified.

what did you have to tweak? your answer might save someone else...

its possible it was marked as a system object; try sys.all_objects instead.

can you try assigning the name to a variable and renaming it?

DECLARE @tb sysname

select @tb = name from sys.tables where name like 'Table%' and name like '%Name'

exec sp_rename @tb,'Table_Name'

the sub folders would server no purpose then,except make the processing a little more difficult. processing a single folder vs lots of subfolders just adds to teh complexity of later...

i assume by you saying "But print statement dos not work correctly!!" you mean they don't print when you want them to, but when the batch completes, right?

you can use...

i have this saved in my snippets, I've only used it a handful of times.

rather than rebuilding the emails, it's just re-queueing the email as however it was originally built:

declare...

if the parameters are datetime data types, it should not make any difference, right?

the values are valid, you are not getting errors, you just happen to see the difference...

rather than an arbitrary count of 1000 or some other static value, would it make more sense to put files in folders based on the dates?

you could group by month,...