And what about configurations? Do you use config files/tables?

There must be some reason why the set-up is different in SQL Server Agent.

Are all the permissions set-up correctly?

Raunak Jhawar (10/4/2010)

---

da-zero (10/4/2010)

---

Raunak Jhawar (10/4/2010)

---

Lookup is always in favour for the reason that no explicit sort is mandatory and the prior to join and check data can be created...

Raunak Jhawar (10/4/2010)

---

Lookup is always in favour for the reason that no explicit sort is mandatory and the prior to join and check data can be created on the fly...

Try the following:

create a variable of type string. Let's call it str_ExecSP.

Populate this variable with the following expression:

"EXEC dbo.proc_TEmptest " + (DT_WSTR,50) @[User::value1] + " , " + (DT_WSTR,50) @[User::value2]...

Are you running the SSIS package in 32 or in 64-bit mode?

It also seems that your connection string is incomplete (or you copy pasted just a small part of it)....

It kind of depends I think 🙂

But if you are allowed to use linked servers and if you have good indexes on those tables, I would prefer the left outer...

Good question and thanks to Oleg for the more detailed explanation.

@nakul: no excuses about having no time to do the detailed reasoning 🙂 Post your question a few days later...

Nice question!

Nice question!

Raunak Jhawar (9/27/2010)

---

rmdichos_29 (9/27/2010)

---

The Case:

Error:

[OLE DB Destination [73]] Error: SSIS Error Code DTS_E_OLEDBERROR. An OLE DB error has occurred. Error code: 0x80004005. An OLE DB record is available. ...

I did a small test, and manually cancelling the package execution in BIDS doesn't generate any logging.

I guess that nobody is logging into your server and manually killing SSIS packages,...

Hugo Kornelis (9/27/2010)

---

It is. ISNUMERIC('1+1') returns 0. And that makes sense, because '1+1' does not convert to any of the numerical...

+ / * - % are arithmetic operators, not numbers. So 1+1...

tommyh (9/27/2010)

---

da-zero (9/27/2010)

---

Good question, although I seem to remember that I've seen similar ones.

But I don't think that considering scientific notation as numeric is stupid. 2e1 is just another way...

Good question, although I seem to remember that I've seen similar ones.

But I don't think that considering scientific notation as numeric is stupid. 2e1 is just another way writing 20,...