Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 1,554 total)
Try this one:
exec master..xp_getfiledetails 'c:\autoexec.bat'
Alternate Name Size Creation Date Creation Time Last Written Date Last Written Time Last Accessed Date Last Accessed Time Attributes
-------------------------------- -----------...
April 24, 2006 at 1:43 am
Are you sure that you need to spread the load like this? 1500 users per se isn't that much. From the SQL Server point of view, it's not excessive. However,...
April 24, 2006 at 1:37 am
Did you notice that it was two years to the day, even?
/Kenneth
April 24, 2006 at 1:28 am
Then check the db compat level. If it's < 70 you'll see this error.
/Kenneth
April 21, 2006 at 5:52 am
In what way 'does it not work' for others than you? Errors? Messages?
Who owns the proc? You or dbo?
In any case 'others' must have execute granted to them on the...
April 21, 2006 at 4:48 am
No there isn't.
afaik there is no immediate way to generate 'real' excelfiles from T-SQL. There is a sort of workaround where you (using xp_cmdshell) when naming the output file use...
April 21, 2006 at 4:44 am
Would this work or produce the same error? (alter is copied from first post)
use tempdb
go
create table dbo.EstDealDetail ( FundNo tinyint not null )
go
insert dbo.EstDealDetail select 1
go
ALTER TABLE dbo.EstDealDetail...
April 21, 2006 at 4:39 am
This seems strange. It works perfectly fine for me. Has to be something else than the syntax, it's just fine. Have you tried that exact statement in QA?
/Kenneth
April 21, 2006 at 2:53 am
Why do you want an identity column added?
'TheDate' is your natural key it seems. Why not use that as PK?
PS. The error you're getting is exactly for the reasons...
April 21, 2006 at 2:49 am
The only way for you to know for sure is to try it out on your data.
Check the plan for your existing IN variant, and compare it with your alternate...
April 20, 2006 at 12:58 am
Thinking about it, this seems to be a perfect job for BCP, and just skip DTS altogether. If the job is just to load the table from a file, then...
April 13, 2006 at 5:02 am
It's no problem at all to use LIKE in a join, just be careful which side is LIKE'd with which.
It should be <longest value> LIKE <short value> + '%'
April 13, 2006 at 4:55 am
About the physical implementations of cursors.. Well it apparently depends.. However, I do think that one shouldn't be too surprised if there would be more locks taken and more tempspace...
April 13, 2006 at 4:34 am
So you have added an identity column as primary key in table 1 (the source table)?
Did it not have a natural key before that?
If not, the identity alone won't protect...
April 13, 2006 at 4:23 am
Yes, that's a major PITA. I don't know of any 'inline' way to do that. The problem is that the only way to be certain the remote server is accessible,...
April 13, 2006 at 3:30 am
Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 1,554 total)