Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 3,233 total)
Just for everyone's benfit, this question has been posted in 6 different threads. I think they've all been linked to this thread now, so we can all work within...
January 12, 2010 at 1:52 pm
This same question has been asked 6 times in different forums. Please only create one thread per question as it causes confusion for those who frequently answer questions. ...
January 12, 2010 at 1:51 pm
Triplicate post, please respond here.
January 12, 2010 at 1:44 pm
Another duplicate post, please contiue this discussion here .
January 12, 2010 at 1:41 pm
Another duplicate post, please contiue this discussion here .
January 12, 2010 at 1:40 pm
No problem. I would not be suprised to find that you get some other solutions from some of the other regulars here on SSC. I cringe at the...
January 12, 2010 at 1:21 pm
OK, that was quicker than I thought. I created a scalar function to be applied to your column. There may be a better way to do this performance...
January 12, 2010 at 1:14 pm
By the way, this is the quick and dirty example. I realize that your data is in a column in a table, which makes my variable based exmaple not...
January 12, 2010 at 1:06 pm
This is an easy task for a tally table with a split function. Do you by chance have a numbers table or split function already in your DB?
If not,...
January 12, 2010 at 1:01 pm
There are other alternatives as well. Can you give us some of the business reasons for wanting to do this? What are you trying to accoplish by switching...
January 12, 2010 at 12:47 pm
Yea, I figured it to be a 2008 thing, but it's odd that the new syntax still works on my 2005 instance.
Thanks again.
January 12, 2010 at 11:19 am
GilaMonster (1/12/2010)
John Rowan (1/11/2010)
Yep, you have to do the same thing when using DROP INDEX too.However that is deprecated syntax. The newer syntax is
DROP INDEX <index name> ON <Table Name>
Thanks...
January 12, 2010 at 10:25 am
Yep, you have to do the same thing when using DROP INDEX too.
January 11, 2010 at 4:55 pm
It looks like the connection manager properties are not being set correctly by the values returned from the for each loop container. Have you tried to toggle the debug...
January 11, 2010 at 4:52 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 3,233 total)