Viewing 15 posts - 1,861 through 1,875 (of 3,232 total)
By using AND, you are telling SQL Server that you want to find all uAccountMovement rows that do not exist in either of the other 2 tables. If you...
March 19, 2008 at 8:58 am
That's a pretty open question. You've obviously posted it because you feel there is a problem. Why don't you give us a description of what you think the...
March 18, 2008 at 10:46 am
When checking for the non-existance of outer joined rows, use the IS NULL comparison instead of the <> (not equals) comparison. The example SQL_ORACLE has given is correct. ...
March 18, 2008 at 10:28 am
I'm with Gail here folks. Why not find and fix the problem instead of masking it with NOLOCKs? If you are 100% OK with dirty reads, maybe consider...
March 18, 2008 at 10:18 am
I don't think that this will cause a deadlock. The SP will already have the rows locked and the update will happen to the new data page. I...
March 17, 2008 at 3:05 pm
xp_cmdshell is disabled by default in SQL Server 2005. Have you enabled it? If not, go to the Surface Area Configuration tool>>Surface Area Configuration for Features and enable...
March 14, 2008 at 11:54 am
I would suggest running SQLDiag.exe the next time your system locks up.
March 14, 2008 at 11:30 am
Yes, having the clustered index on ColC would help. I would suggest dropping the second index on Col1 and recreating your PK as a non-clustered PK. You may...
March 14, 2008 at 11:17 am
I just wanted to thank you all for your military service.
March 14, 2008 at 9:38 am
Globally setting your isolation level to read uncommitted will prevent SELECTS from using shared locks; however, the side effect will be that you are allowing for dirty reads. I...
March 12, 2008 at 12:31 pm
Jeff, that has got to be the best interview story ever told. I almost lost control of my bodily functions trying to contain the laughter!! You're my hero....
March 11, 2008 at 3:41 pm
Not understanding cursors is a benefit to you! Matt has some great advice. Work the problem as if cursors do not exist. If you are going to...
March 10, 2008 at 3:18 pm
No problem. Looking back today, I don't know what I was thinking with the <> join?? Oh well, I'm glad you've got it working. This one was...
March 7, 2008 at 8:32 am
Uh, I'm for hire. 🙂
Both Jeff and SQL Oracle are correct. This to me sounds like a good place for some VB script in DTS. ...
March 6, 2008 at 5:02 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1,861 through 1,875 (of 3,232 total)