Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 234 total)
I am not sure about the exact scenario and the situation but here is something that might help you in determining your solution:
declare @FirstTime datetime
declare @SecondTime datetime
set @FirstTime = '2011-11-05...
November 6, 2011 at 11:21 am
Based on your scenario and insufficient data given, I may not have the accurate solution for you but I have something herein that might give you and idea how to...
November 6, 2011 at 10:54 am
Yes, there is a great way to improve to a certain extent.
Please read up on a section known as advance queries using common table expressions.
I personally have benefited quite a...
November 5, 2011 at 7:17 pm
GilaMonster, excellent points and directions.. currently visiting the URL you have posted..
November 5, 2011 at 11:59 am
Taking out my request.
I have create other UDF and USP to get what I needed and don't need a CLR.
Thx anyway guys..
If anyone is interested in knowing what...
November 2, 2011 at 4:14 pm
The SP returns the data-set as a tabular and good for RDL or crystal reports. But, this sp is really not returning a "table" value set as in Functions.
In another...
November 1, 2011 at 11:26 pm
The main error on creation is:
failed on creating DMO object
October 14, 2011 at 11:15 am
Hi Kraig,
I find your article very intriguing and useful.
We have a replication process that at some point during a week; well, either does not insert a record or it is...
May 3, 2011 at 4:15 pm
Jeff,
I think, and I could be wrong, if they are not having the "void" system then probably will not leave a hole in the sequence either.
Additionally, the trust and...
February 17, 2010 at 3:28 pm
what a nice method.. saved me a cursor and additional coding..
thx man..
February 17, 2010 at 3:15 pm
I agree with your explanation, a very good one I might add.. and also a 64 cents comment of mine would be that the regular view is also useful in...
February 16, 2010 at 5:10 pm
I think in normal accounting, at least in usa, there is a void process that can cancel.. in fact.. any checking account can handle that therefore it should not matter...
February 16, 2010 at 4:51 pm
hamid, salam.. do not translate farsi to english directly.. because you might confuse the readers..
if you want you can write in FarsEnglish and I can translate that for you for...
February 16, 2010 at 4:49 pm
good question Dave.. I don't see any reason for the incremented sequential number for voucher.. the only time that I might have seen that happen was if that a record...
February 16, 2010 at 4:47 pm
very good thinking, but, that did not work.. same error message about creating this type of query in a "named query" in data view part of the solution.
🙁
February 1, 2010 at 3:57 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 234 total)