Viewing 15 posts - 1,126 through 1,140 (of 2,044 total)
Indeed, the select into is faster in the example
Select into: avg 1-2 seconds
Table 'Worktable'. Scan count 201, logical reads 6574, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0.
Table 'jbmTest'. Scan count 0,...
December 18, 2007 at 11:23 am
Can you modify the job to include some additional logging?
Like a ping/tracert log to a textfile before launching the small app?
December 15, 2007 at 3:16 pm
Odd, perhaps a change in the executionplan? You can see the actual plan in the query analyzer.
I guess count(*) or avg(*) give an index scan when min,max use index seek(should...
December 15, 2007 at 3:09 pm
The main problem SELECT INTO is that is locks sysobjects (especially in tempdb) when lots of procedures make use of temporary tables having to wait until the insert is finished....
December 15, 2007 at 3:04 pm
Have you already converted your (var)char columns to n(var)char?
Wildly guessing:
UTF-8 isn't implemented in sql server 2000
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/232580
Working of unicode in ODBC
December 14, 2007 at 2:41 am
Also try to replace SELECT INTO statements
into CREATE TABLE ... INSERT INTO.
Select Into holds some exclusive locks on system tables.
http://searchsqlserver.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid87_gci1284087,00.html
December 14, 2007 at 2:26 am
RAISERROR severity 16 usually stops the processing. (no sysadmin permissions needed)
Instead of the option WITH LOG you can use another logtable?
December 12, 2007 at 11:29 am
Have you tried
sp_changedbowner [ @loginame = ] 'login'
[ , [ @map = ] remap_alias_flag ]
Arguments
[@loginame =] 'login'
Is the login ID of the new owner...
December 12, 2007 at 11:19 am
You have to restore a full backup with the option no recovery / standby as a base (so it doesn't rollback incomplete transactions and additional restores can be done). After...
December 12, 2007 at 11:12 am
have a look at
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic225872-5-1.aspx#bm225893
there error there is also invalid switch
December 7, 2007 at 12:08 pm
I would first try to find out what it does and why. Is the reasoning still valid or could be it done better or in another way. Document it and...
December 6, 2007 at 12:10 pm
It could be that Access decides to pull the whole table in and than doing the find.
Usually it worth creating an extra "query" (on the linked table?) to search for...
December 6, 2007 at 11:48 am
You might be able to do that with "cross-database ownership chaining".
It is in the security tab of the server.
Beware of the security risk:
December 6, 2007 at 11:14 am
ericwilson54 (12/5/2007)
December 6, 2007 at 11:06 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,126 through 1,140 (of 2,044 total)