Viewing 15 posts - 57,661 through 57,675 (of 59,048 total)
Yes... you can insert the output of a SELECT into a temp table with an IDENTITY column to keep track of which rownumber you are working on. Then, loop through the...
September 11, 2006 at 6:47 am
I think you have it... the only thing that I would change is UNION to UNION ALL since it's not likely that there will be any overlap between the two...
September 11, 2006 at 6:43 am
Johann,
Since you're new, the error at lines 24 and 42 was because you cannot have a WHERE clause in an INSERT/VALUE statement. Sreejith corrected that by changing it to an INSERT/SELECT.
The...
September 10, 2006 at 10:52 am
Take a look at Books Online for the OSQL command... the problem is that the default output is set to 80 characters and you must invoke the "-w" parameter with...
September 10, 2006 at 10:19 am
I gotta ask the question, again... you do realize that, except for the Developer's Edition, SQL Server must be installed on a Windows Server...? You've not said that you are actually...
September 10, 2006 at 9:25 am
You are not wrong. Conversely, if you don't want the IDENTITY column to be reset to the SEED value, you must use DELETE, instead.
September 10, 2006 at 9:18 am
In that case, why not just update by what's in the MediaID column? Load the unique media IDs into a temp table (with an autonumbering IDENTITY column) and step through...
September 9, 2006 at 1:44 pm
Would you post your "adaptation" please?
September 9, 2006 at 10:24 am
I suppose there's a way... but, instead, I normally create a temp table with the results of the called proc and then just join to the temp table.
Create the temp...
September 9, 2006 at 10:18 am
What's not working? The only thing I see at a quick glance is that you are trying to insert @@OutID instead of @OutID in the details table.
September 9, 2006 at 10:12 am
I ran your original examples on my production box... both execution plans are identical and they both have parallelism.
Could it be that someone screwed up and turned of auto-calc...
September 8, 2006 at 5:24 pm
Create the temp table at a higher level in the nest. Or, use a global ##temp table (only one named instance can live at a time).
September 8, 2006 at 5:06 pm
The other question would be... how many rows are you updating? It should only take about 3.5 seconds to update 20k rows.
September 8, 2006 at 4:50 pm
Emma,
Both Lynn and John solutions will work for finding the duplicates... the question is, what do you want to do with them once you've found them?
September 8, 2006 at 4:48 pm
It's late and I didn't have a chance to work on this... sorry.
Just to give you a head start, you can mod the code for table name just by replacing...
September 7, 2006 at 9:22 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 57,661 through 57,675 (of 59,048 total)