Viewing 15 posts - 2,026 through 2,040 (of 2,900 total)
Nicholas Cain (1/2/2009)
Anyhow, try removing the WITH FAST option and see if you get different results. Per BOL...
January 2, 2009 at 7:44 am
Many of us prefer to backup to local disk, then copy the flat file to tape later. Faster & more reliable
January 1, 2009 at 12:30 am
For some reason the application that we bought does not use clustered indexes. Most of the non-clustered have been moved to the other file group on G.
Some unique primary key...
December 31, 2008 at 8:59 am
GilaMonster (12/31/2008)
Be sure to rebuild all of your indexes afterwards. Shrink badly fragments indexes.
Does that still apply if the indexes are on another drive ? I'm thinking...
December 31, 2008 at 8:22 am
Maybe you some processes that are blocking other processes ?? Hardware won't fix that. Do you see any blocking during slowness ?
December 30, 2008 at 7:16 pm
This leads into the Fill Factor option. I think the default is 0 (effectively 100 %). In an application with lots of I/O, would 80% be better ?
December 30, 2008 at 2:55 pm
Matt Miller (12/30/2008)
December 30, 2008 at 2:47 pm
So, thanks to you guys my brain is finally starting to catch on !
I could force the query to use the index, but then I run a future risk of...
December 30, 2008 at 2:27 pm
GilaMonster (12/30/2008)
homebrew01 (12/30/2008)
Also, there is no clustered index on most of the tables in this application.Why not? Heaps are messy and have a number of downsides.
Is there a downside to...
December 30, 2008 at 2:07 pm
GilaMonster (12/30/2008)
homebrew01 (12/30/2008)
"isn't SQL doing 55 million seeks"I meant to say: Isn't SQL reading 55 million rows instead of reading 422,000 rows ?
Take a mid-sized computer book with a comprehensive...
December 30, 2008 at 2:06 pm
"isn't SQL doing 55 million seeks"
I meant to say: Isn't SQL reading 55 million rows instead of reading 422,000 rows ?
"Is that all the columns in the table?"
No, I just...
December 30, 2008 at 12:31 pm
GilaMonster (12/30/2008)
homebrew01 (12/30/2008)
Does SQL think that a table scan is better for the larger result set ?
Yes. Because you're doing a select * , the index...
December 30, 2008 at 8:14 am
Nevermind .... I asked the Network assistant and he set me up in 1 minute.
December 23, 2008 at 8:46 am
eseosaoregie (12/3/2008)
December 8, 2008 at 9:13 am
Viewing 15 posts - 2,026 through 2,040 (of 2,900 total)