Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 530 total)
Sorry, I can't see a pattern. Maybe someone else could help?
June 21, 2005 at 3:01 am
Well, with correlation I meant just that your query was not using your table
And I didn't understand entirely your...
June 21, 2005 at 2:56 am
Seems nice but I see no correlation between the procedure and the table DDL you have posted...
It is also considered to be best practice to avoid using the space character...
June 20, 2005 at 10:06 am
That you havn't specified WHICH of the two CompanyID columns you intend with your WHERE clause. Remember that you have two. One in each table. (You need this even if...
June 20, 2005 at 8:51 am
One easy way of getting as few rows as possible could be to retrieve just the rows you absolutely need into a temporary table. Thus you know no more work...
June 20, 2005 at 8:38 am
Did the examples help you?
I would suggest creating your SPs through SQL Query Analyzer
Wizards can be good, but they are not so...
June 20, 2005 at 8:18 am
Hmm.. Well, for example:
ALTER PROCEDURE GetBlindCompany
AS
SELECT DISTINCT
Company.CompanyID, Company.CompanyName, Product.ModelName, Product.ProductImage,
June 20, 2005 at 7:54 am
...but if you do include all columns in your GROUP BY, there is not much point to the query. You could be better off doing a DISTINCT as it would not...
June 20, 2005 at 7:46 am
True, but taking the string and removing the LineFeeds (which usually are not outputted in XML) you have:
<edition number="1 ">Scie </edition><edition number="2 ">Math </edition><edition number="3 ">Litt </edition><edition number="4 ">Litt </edition><edition...
June 20, 2005 at 7:09 am
Haha
Juste to clarify Remi Gregoire, I was directing my answer to
June 20, 2005 at 6:56 am
Hmm. Are you executing this query in query analyzer? Are you aware of the default 256 char column limit in that application?
Try to direct your query into a file...
June 20, 2005 at 6:48 am
Well. Are you sure that SP runs?
Semantically it is incorrect...
..and maybe this question would have been better off if it appeared in the T-SQL section?
//Hanslindgren
June 20, 2005 at 6:39 am
June 20, 2005 at 6:30 am
Hello!
Have you checked if the two schemas (On publisher and on subscriber) are still the same? Could it have been modified at the publisher ant not in the subscriber? Watch...
June 20, 2005 at 5:52 am
Hmm. Just by connecting them with 'sa' capabilities I am not sure has to be considered to be bad practice. Althrough I would connect a specific user (I.e A user would...
June 17, 2005 at 9:54 am
Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 530 total)