Viewing 15 posts - 14,851 through 14,865 (of 49,552 total)
I would guess what they mean is that if you're restoring log backups to get to just before some disaster (like a dropped table), you can restore with standby, query...
January 11, 2013 at 5:23 am
You can use SSMS on your workstation. Personally I don't feel that user apps should be installed on a server.
(no, it can't be downloaded, you'd install SSMS from the SQL...
January 11, 2013 at 5:22 am
zi (1/11/2013)
Thanks for replyingwhat about "for inspection" usage
what do you mean by 'inspection usage'?
, how to apply it,
How to apply what?
and what is the standby file, how to...
January 11, 2013 at 4:19 am
SQLSACT (1/11/2013)
GilaMonster (1/11/2013)
Yes, you could have. The DB was online and available.Thanks, would you recommend it though?
Yes, why not?
Am I right in that the 3rd phase (Undo) is where...
January 11, 2013 at 4:18 am
Typically used in log shipping when you want the secondary to be readable (restore with norecovery is not) and still allow further logs to be restored.
January 11, 2013 at 4:06 am
Yes, you could have. The DB was online and available.
January 11, 2013 at 4:05 am
The max server memory setting controls the buffer pool. That's all of the caches (buffer pool, plan cache, etc) plus the query workspace memory. SQL can and does take memory...
January 11, 2013 at 3:30 am
That's a UPS, not a storage device.
January 10, 2013 at 12:54 pm
YSLGuru (1/10/2013)
January 10, 2013 at 12:54 pm
If you're talking about a RAID array write cache backup battery, then you either must replace it or must disable the write cache or you are risking a corrupt database.
Start...
January 10, 2013 at 12:22 pm
High memory usage from SQL is a good thing. SQL uses memory to cache data and to cache plans. Both of those allow for better performance than if it didn't...
January 10, 2013 at 12:17 pm
DBCC ShrinkFile or DBCC ShrinkDatabase.
January 10, 2013 at 11:56 am
Well... the next step would be to figure out whether high buffer page usage by that object is a problem or not. If it's a large table that's frequently read,...
January 10, 2013 at 11:56 am
The update lock is held until the transaction commits or rolls back.
January 10, 2013 at 11:53 am
yes, providing all the tables have the same column. Not sure it's necessarily a good idea, but you can do it.
January 10, 2013 at 11:52 am
Viewing 15 posts - 14,851 through 14,865 (of 49,552 total)