Viewing 15 posts - 6,916 through 6,930 (of 49,571 total)
Process Explorer (sysinternals) or their simpler tool "handle"
It could have been something as simple as an antivirus grabbing the files. It could have been that the cluster service noticed the...
December 29, 2014 at 7:41 am
You checked what process was using the files?
December 29, 2014 at 7:12 am
Uwe Ricken (12/29/2014)
So DML is ALWAYS single threaded and the threshold of 5 seems to be o.k.
SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE are definitely not always single threaded. They can all run...
December 29, 2014 at 7:10 am
You said the files wouldn't copy, why wouldn't they copy?
December 29, 2014 at 7:00 am
Err, what????
That now doesn't match the query you posted (which returns only two columns) and is the result that you're asking for. If you already have that result, why are...
December 29, 2014 at 6:52 am
What are the values for a.evs_CodeUsed in the table?
December 29, 2014 at 6:47 am
Table definitions (as CREATE TABLE) and some sample data (as INSERT statements) please, if you want a tested answer.
Initial guess, your ROW_NUMBER needs a Partition By
December 29, 2014 at 5:56 am
Paul Brewer (12/29/2014)
http://www.sqlskills.com/blogs/paul/determine-causes-particular-wait-type/
It describes a way of defining an extending events session to capture the internal...
December 29, 2014 at 5:24 am
Paul Brewer (12/29/2014)
December 29, 2014 at 5:02 am
Paul Brewer (12/29/2014)
2. Do not cause any latch contention in tempdb, there are work arounds (trace flags and multiple tempdb files) but it's still a pain.
Are you sure about...
December 29, 2014 at 4:53 am
m.kancleris (12/29/2014)
Anyway, "index scan" is rare thing 🙂 on proper databases
Is it? 😉
It's surprisingly easy to have SQL tip to a table/index scan when it's using a non-covering...
December 29, 2014 at 4:01 am
m.kancleris (12/29/2014)
It does not return rows multiple times and does not miss any row
Yes, it can.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190805%28v=sql.105%29.aspx
Missing one or more rows that were not the target of update
When you are...
December 29, 2014 at 3:48 am
Igor Micev (12/29/2014)
Then, even though the isolation level is READ COMMITTED using row versions, there are sill deadlocks.
Yes, and?
I've read that read committed snapshot uses pessimistic writes, and snapshot uses...
December 29, 2014 at 3:41 am
m.kancleris (12/29/2014)
"Don't use NOLOCK" - should have "(depends)" tag too.It depends on database design. Personally, I use it a lot to increase SELECT performance.
NOLOCK is not a performance tuning...
December 29, 2014 at 3:29 am
Depends. If you explicitly request an isolation level, you get whichever one you request. If you allow the default of read committed, then you get read committed using row versions.
December 29, 2014 at 3:10 am
Viewing 15 posts - 6,916 through 6,930 (of 49,571 total)