Viewing 15 posts - 48,466 through 48,480 (of 49,571 total)
The major groups are fine. The forums within them seem to be changing order every time I visit.
September 27, 2007 at 9:33 am
In the forums, posts only. Generally, but not always, high post count shows someone who spends time answering questions, hence contributing to the site.
It's not difficult to get the QotD...
September 27, 2007 at 9:17 am
Questions are still multiple choice, but they're based off a business case given, usually a couple pages worth. As a very rough, very simplified example. (the question may not have...
September 27, 2007 at 9:01 am
What do you want the result to look like?
September 27, 2007 at 7:20 am
Rather than use nolock, move any select statements that you can out of the transaction completely. This will shorten the duration of the transaction, as well as reducing locking.
September 26, 2007 at 12:24 pm
Thanks. None of them are serious, though the doubling lines has the possibility of getting very amusing very quickly. :hehe:
September 26, 2007 at 12:03 pm
Try also leaving the parameters and marking the proc for recompile every time it runs. (CREATE PROCEDURE ... WITH RECOMPILE)
Using variables, the optimiser can not make any conclusions about the...
September 26, 2007 at 9:55 am
There are 1000 milliseconds in a second, but even with that, it looks odd. How many CPUs do you have?
Are these lock waits? What's the full object and counter...
September 26, 2007 at 9:50 am
Mal Content (9/26/2007)
That's odd. Everything I have read says it's better not to have compound indexes because the optimizer can deal with separate indexes more efficiently. Do you have...
September 26, 2007 at 9:41 am
Thought so. I have a similar issue that appears from time to time.
What happens is that the stats for a date-time column get out of date and the optimiser...
September 26, 2007 at 8:51 am
You could try breaking the proc up into smaller procs. Check when transactions start and end and reduce them to the smallest necessary size.
Run profiler with the deadlock chain event...
September 26, 2007 at 7:16 am
Jeff Moden (23/09/2007)
Yeah... just not for access to the Production box 😉
Personally, I don't have a problem with some developers having very limited access to the production dbs. Key phrase...
September 23, 2007 at 9:27 am
Look in books online for sp_attach_single_file_db. That should do the trick.
September 23, 2007 at 8:42 am
If you're using windows authentication, then have the domain admins create a windows group for the developers and grant that access to SQL.
If you're using sql authentication, you'll have...
September 22, 2007 at 10:21 pm
Did you remove builtin admins as well? If not, windows authentication will get you in. I presume you don't know the sa password.
I've never tested this, but from what I've...
September 22, 2007 at 10:16 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 48,466 through 48,480 (of 49,571 total)