Viewing 15 posts - 48,196 through 48,210 (of 49,571 total)
There's no need to kill processes manually in a deadlock. When SQL picks up that a deadlock has occured, one of the processes is selected as the deadlock victim and...
November 22, 2007 at 11:44 pm
karthikeyan (11/22/2007)
So totally i have 1.8 years experience in IT Field.
And you call yourself a senior software engineer? Personally I'd consider anyone under 2 years junior.
Someone claims to...
November 22, 2007 at 11:28 pm
So we do the work and you get the award? 😉
Performance tuning is an art and it's mostly trial and error. I've been doing perf tuning for close on 4...
November 22, 2007 at 2:19 am
What are you looking for?
November 22, 2007 at 1:36 am
Style differs from one programmer to another. We all have our prefered way of writing things.
Other things. Variable and class naming (where appropriate) Use of whitespace. Placing of brackets,...
November 22, 2007 at 1:25 am
That's a nice tax level. I lose around 45% of my salary to tax.
Tt's a big incentive to go solo. The tax rates for self-employed is lower to start...
November 22, 2007 at 12:39 am
Bob Fazio (11/20/2007)
November 22, 2007 at 12:38 am
Malcolm Daughtree (11/21/2007)
NONE.
You never use CheckDB on your systems?
Index rebuilds don't need DBCC anymore (alter index ... rebuild) and most of the other DBCCs aren't needed except...
November 22, 2007 at 12:26 am
Your new query contains a correlated subquery (subselect in the select clause)
Depending on the optimiser, it's quite likely that the subquery will be executed for each row of the outer...
November 22, 2007 at 12:19 am
The second is a correlated sub query. Depending on the optimiser, it's ikely that the subquery will be executed for each row of the outer query. Essentially, it's a cursor...
November 22, 2007 at 12:17 am
Joe Contreras (11/21/2007)
Now I'm back playing the political game, and the work that needs to be done becomes secondary.
Time for some polishing of the CV?
I'm in almost the...
November 21, 2007 at 11:36 pm
James Horsley (11/19/2007)
So MS could add a performance boost in SQL2009 by short circuiting ...
I don't think so.
Bear in mind that SQL is a declarative language, not a procedureal one....
November 21, 2007 at 11:34 pm
Ouch. I've got 447 coming up in 3 weeks. I'm not looking forward to it.
November 21, 2007 at 5:42 am
Assuming that you're using SQL 2005 (you are posting this in a SQL 2005 forum), the row number function will do exactly what you want.
select ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY c3...
November 21, 2007 at 1:11 am
Sure. As an example
CREATE VIEW MyView AS
SELECT Col1, Col2, Col1+Col2 AS CalculatedColumn FROM SomeTable
GO
November 20, 2007 at 11:46 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 48,196 through 48,210 (of 49,571 total)