Viewing 15 posts - 46,906 through 46,920 (of 49,571 total)
Please don't cross post. It just wastes people's time. Many of the regulars here read all the forums.
No replies to this thread please, direct replies to-
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic485382-357-1.aspx
April 16, 2008 at 12:35 am
At this point in time, I would suggest you not consider the MCDBA, unless you have a good reason. The SQL 2000 exams are due to be retired soon.
Consider the...
April 16, 2008 at 12:33 am
On that server at that time, no, because the server was clustered and the DAC was set as local only. That has since been changed.
I have tested, and you can...
April 16, 2008 at 12:32 am
Why do you have a job that shrinks the log file? If you're doing regular log backups, it shouldn't be necessary.
If the database is in simple recovery, the log...
April 15, 2008 at 2:37 pm
I'm assuming you downloaded SQL Express. Profiler's not included in that, it's only in the non-free editions.
If you want to learn and play, download the evaluation version of SQL. That...
April 15, 2008 at 2:10 pm
Grant Fritchey (4/15/2008)
... and look at your execution plan (I'm getting sick of typing that. Anyone have a macro?)
Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V. I'm starting to keep a text file of common...
April 15, 2008 at 1:56 pm
.sqldb is not the extension of a SQL server database or script. SQLite is not in any way related to SQL Server
Perhaps the SQLDB viewer on this page will help...
April 15, 2008 at 1:49 pm
There are utilities available to decrypt stored procs. You should be able to find one with google easily.
Other option, run profiler and trace the sp_statement starting event. Then run...
April 15, 2008 at 1:35 pm
The error message means exactly what it says. BACKUP LOG WITH TRUNCATE_ONLY is deprecated and will not work in a future version of SQL Server (in SQL 2008 specifically). It...
April 15, 2008 at 1:33 pm
Take the tuning adviser's advice with a large pinch of salt. It was a tendency to massively over-recommend.
What I would suggest is that you try the indexes that it's suggested...
April 15, 2008 at 1:26 pm
Well, yes. All that's currently doing, is looping over the records. You'll need to add in logic to do whatever inside the while loop.
while (@@fetch_status = 0)
Begin
...
April 15, 2008 at 6:40 am
Jeff Moden (4/15/2008)
April 15, 2008 at 6:36 am
Dunno. Post the code please?
Make sure you've changed both of the Fetch Next ... to use the variables, otherwie you will only get the first row, 4 times.
April 15, 2008 at 6:24 am
Maybe. It depends on the queries run, the data distribution, the indexes you have. It's not a question that can be answered in general.
April 15, 2008 at 6:00 am
Pretty close. You'll need to fetch the email into a variable (ie FETCH NEXT ... INTO @SomeVariable), then the sending logic goes inside the while loop just before the FETCH.
Just...
April 15, 2008 at 5:44 am
Viewing 15 posts - 46,906 through 46,920 (of 49,571 total)