Viewing 15 posts - 46,696 through 46,710 (of 49,571 total)
Thanks
Yup, looks like a permissions problem. Just note, it's the SQL Server Service account that needs rights to that directory. Not the account that you are logged in as.
May 6, 2008 at 1:46 pm
Please don't cross post. It just wastes people's time and fragments replies.
No replies to this thread please. Direct replies to the following
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic495651-291-1.aspx
May 6, 2008 at 1:45 pm
Except that he's got nothing to do any ordering by, and nothing in the data that defines which the 'first' row is. Hence the necessity of the 'numbers' column in...
May 6, 2008 at 1:37 pm
I said that the fact that the table's a heap may have something to do with how the optimiser costs the seek vs the scan. Your query pulls 0.06% of...
May 6, 2008 at 1:26 pm
Yup. That's one of the key selling points for it. Backed up with the database, transactional and will triggers, but in the file system, not split up in database pages
May 6, 2008 at 1:24 pm
2 very big databases both used by 1 app. Very heavy temp table usage.
All 12 processors used by SQL. 64bit Itanium Enterprise edition on Server 2003 Datacenter. It was SQL...
May 6, 2008 at 7:58 am
With stored procs/parameterised queries is the only way to be sure. Yes, it's a lot of work. how much work is going in to fixing that database?
If you're just replacing...
May 6, 2008 at 6:52 am
Other option is to enable traceflag 1204 or 1222. SQL will write the deadlock graph into the error log.
May 6, 2008 at 5:51 am
Pleasure.
It's simply a data type and conversion issue. Any expression that just involves integers will return an integer. If the expression inlcludes multiple types, then the result will be of...
May 6, 2008 at 5:30 am
Providing you set the number to 1 for the rows that you want returning. In the sample you gave, code 3x doesn't have a 1.
May 6, 2008 at 4:34 am
There's no such thing as a physical order based search in SQL server. A table is, by definition, an unordered set.
If you don't have a column specifying the order,...
May 6, 2008 at 4:01 am
Cast one or both to float/numeric before doing the divide
(CAST(@used AS FLOAT)/ CAST(@max AS FLOAT))*100
Use float is you're not worried about floating point inaccuracies, otherwise use a numeric with the...
May 6, 2008 at 3:58 am
Link doesn't want to show. Please convert the image to jpg and attach it to a post here. Is much easier.
May 6, 2008 at 3:53 am
set @ber = 6/5 is doing an integer divide, hence throwing away the fraction. Try the following
set @ber = 6.0/5.0
May 6, 2008 at 3:51 am
Viewing 15 posts - 46,696 through 46,710 (of 49,571 total)