Viewing 15 posts - 44,461 through 44,475 (of 49,571 total)
That reads out of the default trace.
If you're not trying to go too far back in time, it will work. The trace is limited to 5 files of 20...
September 17, 2008 at 10:16 am
What kind of 'batch processing'?
Sometimes SQL will parallel processes and sometimes it won't as there is an overhead in running stuff in parallel.
September 17, 2008 at 9:42 am
I don't believe this kind of info is kept historically, unless there's some custom monitoring in place.
September 17, 2008 at 9:41 am
Tanveer (9/17/2008)
The default db for 'sa' is master but this default exist in sql 2000 as well and there I have no issues.
That's as it's supposed to be.
Do you...
September 17, 2008 at 9:33 am
As I said above, I'd do checkDB first, as there's little point in trying to rebuild indexes of a database with corruption. Also, it's very likely that the index rebuild...
September 17, 2008 at 7:05 am
The equality/inequality refers to how the columns are used in the query that resulted in the missing index entry.
Generally, if you are going to use the missing index stats DMV...
September 17, 2008 at 6:35 am
It's not a SQL 2005-specific problem. The error (specifically the state) is saying that the database requested by the login isn't available, either because it's not there, is offline or...
September 17, 2008 at 6:34 am
What Brad is saying is that in active/active, you are running two difference instances, one on each node. It's not possible to run one instance on both nodes at the...
September 17, 2008 at 2:11 am
They'll have to have different names. Both instances are installed on both nodes, although they're only active on one at a time.
September 17, 2008 at 1:40 am
It's not unusual (in SP4 of SQL 2000) to see self-blocking. It's usually nothing to worry about. It may indicate parallelism or just that part of the query execution is...
September 17, 2008 at 1:32 am
Christopher Stobbs (9/16/2008)
Hi Gila,I'm South African, but not currently in SA, would I be of any help to your 🙂
Thanks
Chris
Would you be willing to do a presentation via Live Meeting...
September 17, 2008 at 1:32 am
I know someone in that area. I'll drop him a note, see if he's interested.
September 17, 2008 at 1:28 am
Terri .K Wei (9/16/2008)
September 17, 2008 at 1:20 am
I'd run it before. There's not much point in doing expensive maintenance on a database that's corrupt. If there's any corruption present, the reindex would probably throw errors anyway.
September 17, 2008 at 12:58 am
No impact other than that you will no longer be able to take log backup and hence will not be able to restore to a point-in-time after switching to simple....
September 17, 2008 at 12:57 am
Viewing 15 posts - 44,461 through 44,475 (of 49,571 total)