Viewing 15 posts - 44,101 through 44,115 (of 49,571 total)
Milu (10/1/2008)
I got so many new concepts from both of your post..thanks you a lot to both of you. but still i am in dark on my...
October 1, 2008 at 10:30 am
pavankumar.mvs (10/1/2008)
I am new to sql server 2005. I have few questions to the forum, Please give me the solutions.
1). My database is running fine all...
October 1, 2008 at 9:04 am
Maybe.
It depends on whether the clustered index is useful for the queries that are causing the locking. All tables should have a clustered index and 0 or more nonclustered indexes,...
October 1, 2008 at 9:01 am
Wilfred van Dijk (10/1/2008)
Clustering is a failover system for your server (not for your storage), while mirroring is a failover for your complete environment.
Mirroring is a failover for a...
October 1, 2008 at 8:58 am
Clustering's good when you need redundancy for the entire server, not just a single databases.
Mirroring happens at the database level, so if the app depends on resources outside of the...
October 1, 2008 at 8:55 am
Sandy (10/1/2008)
I do agree with you for both the point you specified in above post.
Yeah, but table variables are treated the same in terms of the TempDB system tables...
October 1, 2008 at 8:49 am
Mark Kinnear (10/1/2008)
So if the recovery interval is increased, would that have a bad effect on the Db?
It would mean that recovery would take longer, in the case where the...
October 1, 2008 at 8:43 am
Depends on how the tables are been used. If many of the queries are of the form
SELECT A, B, C, E, F, G, H, N FROM [TableName] WHERE A =...
October 1, 2008 at 2:15 am
WayneS (9/30/2008)
October 1, 2008 at 2:07 am
Sandy (9/30/2008)
Gail & Meely,I think Gail can better answer for this,
I wanted to know your thoughts on why table variables were better than temp tables for 'highly transactional' workloads....
October 1, 2008 at 2:01 am
Jack Corbett (9/30/2008)
October 1, 2008 at 1:55 am
Scott Ohar (9/30/2008)
October 1, 2008 at 1:48 am
Only in terms of reducing blocking on the allocation pages of TempDB.
September 30, 2008 at 2:09 pm
That's a huge machine. The largest I've ever played with was a 16 proc box with 64 GB memory.
September 30, 2008 at 2:08 pm
Clay.Angelly (9/30/2008)
I think we'll shelve SQL Server 2005 for now and see if SQL Server 2008 handles this any differently.
Looking at the code you have, not likely. 2008, in...
September 30, 2008 at 2:07 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 44,101 through 44,115 (of 49,571 total)