Viewing 15 posts - 42,661 through 42,675 (of 49,552 total)
santhoshkumar.boregowda (12/2/2008)
The SUM of above must be equal to zero.
No way to ensure that with a float.
Any Suggestion?
Change the data type to one that is precise and accurate.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
December 2, 2008 at 2:07 pm
santhoshkumar.boregowda (12/2/2008)
Actually these types of result are affecting the production in one or other way.
some batches will be having a query like
WHERE col = '0'...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
December 2, 2008 at 2:05 pm
You're not getting a junk value, you're getting a value very close to 0. -2.7465348468E-13 is scientific notation. Expanded out it's 0.000000000000227373675443232
Float's aren't accurate data types. They're approximate and rounding...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
December 2, 2008 at 1:20 pm
As I said, firstly, the growth should not be 10%. That's a bad default and it gets out of hand on larger databases. Change it to a fixed size (depending...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
December 2, 2008 at 1:16 pm
jeffkretz (12/2/2008)
Does anyone have any opionions about this practice? Good idea? Bad idea?
JK
I think a lot of people do that or do a full technical interview before the...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
December 2, 2008 at 1:12 pm
Grant Fritchey (12/2/2008)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
December 2, 2008 at 1:01 pm
Two things.
Autogrow should not be left on a percentage (the default) as that causes massive grows for larger databases, with the resulting time problems and poor performance during the grow.
You...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
December 2, 2008 at 12:59 pm
You could. I had this nasty mess on my hands once on SQL 2000.
SELECT SomeColumn, CONVERT(varchar(20),SomeDate,107) AS SomeDate
FRom SomeTable
Order By SomeDate
The ordering came out with April first.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
December 2, 2008 at 11:41 am
Paul Randal (12/2/2008)
Of course,...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
December 2, 2008 at 11:29 am
Could you post the complete output of checkDB please, with all of its errors and recomendations.
Was this DB upgraded from SQL 2000 and how long ago was it upgraded?
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
December 2, 2008 at 11:09 am
Grant Fritchey (12/2/2008)
Sorry. What I said earlier was misleading. Also, on rereading, I'm not shocked that this doesn't...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
December 2, 2008 at 10:47 am
scb (12/2/2008)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
December 2, 2008 at 10:40 am
Chris Morris (12/2/2008)
What is it about DBA's wanting to look like Darth Vader? 😛
I have no idea...
I just have him as my cell phone ring tone...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
December 2, 2008 at 10:31 am
No. 3gb and AWE are for 32 bit only.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
December 2, 2008 at 10:30 am
Shark Energy (12/2/2008)
EDIT: If going with this plan, which array would I be best sticking backups on?
A separate one. Backups onto the same array as data is firstly an eggs...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
December 2, 2008 at 10:05 am
Viewing 15 posts - 42,661 through 42,675 (of 49,552 total)