Viewing 15 posts - 41,476 through 41,490 (of 49,552 total)
PG (1/22/2009)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
January 22, 2009 at 1:56 pm
DBADave (1/22/2009)
although who is to say the author is correct.
Connor's currently the program manager of the Query Optimisation team and, previously (iirc) was one of the lead developers...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
January 22, 2009 at 1:35 pm
Network admins at my previous company didn't allow any of those to be used anywhere.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
January 22, 2009 at 1:30 pm
You can always combine include columns without an effect
You can usually combine the inequalities without breaking anything, not always
You usually can't combine equality columns without causing a problem.
I blogged earlier...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
January 22, 2009 at 1:29 pm
tgarland (1/22/2009)
I have thought about combining those into one index that looks like the following but I am not sure if that would make the index less valuable:
Looks fine.
This...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
January 22, 2009 at 1:09 pm
K. Brian Kelley (1/22/2009)
Sorry, folks, but we have had solutions to prevent unencrypted data flowing across the data into SQL Server. 🙂
We have em. The question of who uses them...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
January 22, 2009 at 12:55 pm
DBADave (1/22/2009)
32GB of memory.
From those stats, SQL's using maybe 200MB of that for proc cache. Not much
They have a lot of dynamic code executed from their application servers. If...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
January 22, 2009 at 12:53 pm
Hollyz (1/22/2009)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
January 22, 2009 at 12:51 pm
DBADave (1/22/2009)
He said re-use(%) is low and asked to see our L2 cache. How does this pertain to L2 cache?
It doesn't. That's looking at details of the procedure cache,...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
January 22, 2009 at 12:42 pm
Won't that only happen if multiple CPUs (multiple running worker threads) are after the exact same data at the exact same time?
Dave: Talking about the processor cache impact on performance...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
January 22, 2009 at 12:05 pm
Roy Ernest (1/22/2009)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
January 22, 2009 at 11:49 am
Grant Fritchey (1/22/2009)
I've been force-fed his chops before. The bruises heal.
Whatever did you do to deserve that?
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
January 22, 2009 at 11:40 am
DBADave (1/22/2009)
His answer was that they have witnessed the Optimizer picking incorrect query plans that have lead to performance problems.
Not uncommon, when one has out of date...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
January 22, 2009 at 11:31 am
Bob Hovious (1/22/2009)
Never looked at the execution plan though.
Providing you haven't left a cross join in by accident, it'll be the same as for the one with JOIN.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
January 22, 2009 at 11:21 am
Unfortunately, with sharepoint, there's not much you can do. You can't change the code and if you add any indexes, MS will no longer support you. From what I understand,...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
January 22, 2009 at 10:29 am
Viewing 15 posts - 41,476 through 41,490 (of 49,552 total)