Viewing 15 posts - 35,746 through 35,760 (of 49,557 total)
Since you're using SQL 2005 (or I assume you are, since this is posted in the SQL 2005 forums), use sys.databases instead. The statuses are neatly broken down in a...
November 19, 2009 at 4:18 am
GilaMonster (11/19/2009)
Please post table definitions, index definitions and execution plan, as per http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/SQLServerCentral/66909/
November 19, 2009 at 4:17 am
Edwin-376531 (11/18/2009)
During my testing, I run into some issues that indicated the publisher database is in Simple recovery model.
Transactional replication does not depend on recovery model. http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2008/12/05/a-new-sql-myth/
What issues did you...
November 19, 2009 at 3:17 am
Jack Corbett (11/18/2009)
j_braclin (11/18/2009)
i dunno. This kind of confused me.
Well then ask some questions. What are you confused about? I'm sure Gail, the author, will try to clarify,...
November 19, 2009 at 3:14 am
A clustered index scan is a table scan, so that's usually a bad thing.
Please post table definitions, index definitions and execution plan, as per http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/SQLServerCentral/66909/
November 19, 2009 at 3:11 am
Cliff Jones (11/18/2009)
November 19, 2009 at 3:10 am
john.arnott (11/18/2009)
Again, as Emily Letitia would have said, "Never mind."
Indeed. Who creates a database without checking to see if the drive they want to create it on really exists?
November 19, 2009 at 3:06 am
1) Probably.
2) Still don't understand what you're asking. When a transaction occurs, all necessary changes are made in memory. When the transaction is completed, the changes are hardened into the...
November 19, 2009 at 3:05 am
sjsubscribe (11/18/2009)
November 19, 2009 at 3:03 am
CGSJohnson (11/18/2009)
I am running a query against that table and, from my testing, it takes anywhere from 28 to 73 seconds to return results.
How many rows returned? What's...
November 18, 2009 at 12:47 pm
Charles Kincaid (11/18/2009)
When talking about included columns one would guess that the order is no more or less important than the column order in the table itself.
Indeed. Order for included...
November 18, 2009 at 12:37 pm
Yes, but would still like table definitions, index definitions and the query that we're trying to help you with.
November 18, 2009 at 12:36 pm
The problem is, without seeing the cursor definition and how the inserts and deletes relate to the cursor, it's hard to say anything useful. A simple insert and delete in...
November 18, 2009 at 9:28 am
Nope. Bit far to travel and I've already done Seattle this year. Enough travelling for a few months.
November 18, 2009 at 9:03 am
The first thing you need to ask is whether the poor performance is normal or abnormal. Is the system always slow or is it usually fast, but has been slow...
November 18, 2009 at 9:02 am
Viewing 15 posts - 35,746 through 35,760 (of 49,557 total)