Viewing 15 posts - 34,726 through 34,740 (of 49,552 total)
After looking at the exec plan, I'm in full agreement with Lynn. Move the clustered index to the currentdateout column. That should greatly improve your performance and may make it...
January 14, 2010 at 9:13 am
dba_pkashyap (1/14/2010)
ThanksHmm, I can find the object which was re-created but not when it was deleted!!
Then it's likely it was too long ago. It will have been logged in...
January 14, 2010 at 9:10 am
You can query the default trace, provided it wasn't deleted too long ago. Default trace is max 5 files of 20MB each, found in the error log directory, can be...
January 14, 2010 at 8:13 am
You can, but it's done by querying the view that contains the perfmon values. It's also harder to interpret, as it's not immediately apparent what the number that the view...
January 14, 2010 at 7:40 am
David Kranes (1/14/2010)
The queries and indexes are optimized. They are only returning in some cases 3 rows.
It's not the number they're returning that the problem, it's the amount that...
January 14, 2010 at 7:05 am
Was one database restored initially from a backup of the other? If not, the restore will not work as SQL will consider the two to be different databases.
Bear in mind,...
January 14, 2010 at 6:59 am
Have you looked at optimising the query/indexes? If the amount of data that the query needs can be reduced, then the initial call should be faster (and subsequent even faster...
January 14, 2010 at 6:57 am
I don't think that can be done at all. When restoring filegroups, the primary filegroup must match the primary where the backup was taken from (ie they must be the...
January 14, 2010 at 6:21 am
Please don't cross post. It just wastes peoples time and fragments replies.
No replies to this thread please. Direct replies to: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic847433-17-1.aspx
January 14, 2010 at 6:15 am
SQL 2000 or SQL 2005? You posted one thread in each forum.
January 14, 2010 at 4:52 am
Please don't cross post. It just wastes peoples time and fragments replies.
No replies to this thread please. Direct replies to: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic847427-338-1.aspx
January 14, 2010 at 4:52 am
In this very small, very specific case, yes. However order is not guaranteed unless you specify an Order By. The SQL query processor is allowed to change the rows as...
January 14, 2010 at 4:50 am
Better, yes, but still not a good thing to recommend without at least mentioning what nolock really means.
January 14, 2010 at 4:44 am
Since you're using SQL 2005, can you rather enable traceflag 1222 instead of 1204
DBCC TRACEON(1222,-1)
Is the deadlock reproducible?
Is the conditional part of a transaction that earlier did something on the...
January 14, 2010 at 3:46 am
Please don't cross post. It just wastes peoples time and fragments replies.
No replies to this thread please. Direct replies to: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic847095-19-1.aspx
January 14, 2010 at 3:40 am
Viewing 15 posts - 34,726 through 34,740 (of 49,552 total)