Viewing 15 posts - 30,346 through 30,360 (of 49,552 total)
Drikus Roux (9/26/2010)
It would seem that your collation clash is between the SQL database collation and that of a field stored by the Windows operating system.
Or more likely...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 27, 2010 at 12:18 am
abcim (9/27/2010)
(Note: The third one will use Top 1 so that it will not fail(only fails if no rows are present))
In which case it will perform absolutely terribly as you'll...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 27, 2010 at 12:13 am
Best for what?
Performance? The first two will be the same, dunno about the third, should be very close.
Readability? I'd say the second.
Validity? The third will fail if there's more...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 27, 2010 at 12:03 am
Urrrr... R2 did not get installed this weekend. Don't know when I'm going to get to it.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 26, 2010 at 11:52 pm
WayneS (9/25/2010)
(Been relaxing all week - sorry this is belated.)
CONGRATULATIONS Gail! SSC is a much better place with you!
Thanks.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 26, 2010 at 11:51 pm
Nope.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 25, 2010 at 5:32 am
The ALTER DATABASE ... MOVE was not an option for any database other than TempDB on SQL 2000.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 25, 2010 at 2:57 am
No issues.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 25, 2010 at 2:54 am
I'm guessing that you have little to no experience writing windows or web applications?
Maybe work through the tutorials here: http://www.asp.net/get-started
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 25, 2010 at 2:52 am
abcim (9/25/2010)
Whether here i use single composite index or single index for A,B and C or something else?
Something else. You want the minimum number of indexes that will satisfy all...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 25, 2010 at 2:47 am
YeePee (9/24/2010)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 24, 2010 at 11:59 am
Brandie Tarvin (9/24/2010)
That's why I think this tech is the basis of database snapshoting and mirroring.
Snapshot, yes (copy-on-write). Mirroring, no.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 24, 2010 at 11:14 am
Roger Abram (9/24/2010)
Thanks... we don't own the SQL Server 2005 64 bit version. Just the 32 bit version.
You don't buy a licence for SQL 2005 x86 or SQL...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 24, 2010 at 11:13 am
Firstly, don't reply on autogrow. If you know the DB is growing, manually increase the size of the files to a sensible value.
These may help in finding the problems.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 24, 2010 at 11:09 am
anish_ns (9/24/2010)
I have also set the max server memory for SQL server to be 64GB. SQL is also x64 and we are also running Analytical Services on the same server.
You're...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 24, 2010 at 11:09 am
Viewing 15 posts - 30,346 through 30,360 (of 49,552 total)