Viewing 15 posts - 24,481 through 24,495 (of 49,552 total)
Chris Kitchen (8/4/2011)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
August 4, 2011 at 6:50 am
Chris Kitchen (8/4/2011)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
August 4, 2011 at 5:50 am
There's probably no such object. The page header of that particular page is damaged and could lead to an incorrect object_id. The object that page actually belongs to is 988855631...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
August 4, 2011 at 5:26 am
Please run the following and post the full and complete output.
DBCC CHECKDB (<Database Name>) WITH NO_INFOMSGS, ALL_ERRORMSGS
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
August 4, 2011 at 2:45 am
2 Tim 3:16 (2/23/2009)
If you purchased "Software Assurance" with your initial license, then there is no upgrade cost. If not, you have to purcfhase from scratch.
That's true for all...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
August 4, 2011 at 2:40 am
Jeffrey Williams-493691 (8/3/2011)
GilaMonster (8/3/2011)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
August 4, 2011 at 2:30 am
YSLGuru (8/3/2011)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
August 4, 2011 at 2:24 am
Tom.Thomson (8/3/2011)
which stopped happening 11 years ago) because US immigration control has deteriorated to the point where no-one in his right mind wants to travel to the USA anyway
Tell me...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
August 3, 2011 at 3:30 pm
Shrinkfile/shrinkdatabase is the only way.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
August 3, 2011 at 3:14 pm
Service either isn't running or the name used is wrong.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
August 3, 2011 at 3:13 pm
Please post table definitions, index definitions and execution plan, as per http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/SQLServerCentral/66909/
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
August 3, 2011 at 3:07 pm
Did you read through the page that Ysaias linked to?
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
August 3, 2011 at 2:01 pm
In your case, unless Index1 is clustered, I'd do the following:
Drop Index1
Change index2 to UNIQUE INDEX (RID) INCLUDE (DeliveryCartID)
Sure, key lookups on a single row isn't expensive, but there's always...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
August 3, 2011 at 1:59 pm
Check in DTC what the state of the transaction is. Also, try a restart of DTS (not SQL, not the machine, just MSDTC), see if that fixes anything.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
August 3, 2011 at 1:53 pm
Table spools are generally optimisations so that the execution engine doesn't have to go back and recalculate things.
Sure the costs are correct and the table spool really is the problem?
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
August 3, 2011 at 1:51 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 24,481 through 24,495 (of 49,552 total)