Viewing 15 posts - 23,116 through 23,130 (of 49,552 total)
Ninja's_RGR'us (10/3/2011)
If I were in the ops shoes, change management procedure / code reviews would be on top of my list in the currently hapenning meeting.
And a QA environment with...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 3, 2011 at 8:47 am
Run the following, post the full and complete results.
DBCC CHECKDB (<Database Name>) WITH NO_INFOMSGS, ALL_ERRORMSGS
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 3, 2011 at 8:38 am
A few more answers:
Chances the rollback will fail: virtually none. SQL ensures that it reserves space in the tran log to roll any transaction back.
Bloating of the log: Only due...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 3, 2011 at 8:37 am
As I said right at the beginning...
GilaMonster (9/19/2011)
Nothing more that can really be said with the little you posted.
I'd start...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 3, 2011 at 8:30 am
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Transaction+Log/72488/
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 3, 2011 at 12:14 am
prithvi.m (10/2/2011)
This would mean that you need to use Degree's of Parallelism (MAXDOP).
Err, no.
MAXDOP sets the maximum number of cores that operators in a single query can run. What...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 2, 2011 at 11:56 pm
Maybe, but probably not. (Can't say more with such little info)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 2, 2011 at 11:54 pm
Because the optimiser doesn't consider the definition of the clustered index when recommending non-clustered indexes.
If you need the clustering key in an non-clustered index, specify it. If you don't, leave...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 2, 2011 at 5:32 pm
Lynn Pettis (10/2/2011)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 2, 2011 at 5:24 pm
Partitioning for performance seldom works. That's just not a good reason to partition tables in general.
The high level steps are detailed in Books Online. Create the partition scheme (and...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 2, 2011 at 11:31 am
What's the reason for partitioning the table?
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 2, 2011 at 9:56 am
As I said, At best it'll have no effect. At worst it'll slow things down.
If you have blocking you really have 3 options:
Tune the queries (they're unlikely to be...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 2, 2011 at 9:54 am
No. At best it'll have no effect. At worst it'll slow things down.
If you mean an indexed view (a view with a clustered index) that will potentially slow all updates...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 2, 2011 at 8:06 am
Duplicate post. No replies to this thread please. Direct replies to:http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1184035-391-1.aspx
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 2, 2011 at 4:33 am
giontech (10/1/2011)
GilaMonster (10/1/2011)
giontech (10/1/2011)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 2, 2011 at 4:31 am
Viewing 15 posts - 23,116 through 23,130 (of 49,552 total)