Viewing 15 posts - 22,531 through 22,545 (of 49,552 total)
anthony.green (11/3/2011)
I do a checkdb once a month using
Is once a month often enough? Do you retain all your backups (logs included) for a full month?
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 3, 2011 at 10:17 am
IO contention? CheckDB is IO intensive, if something else is hammering the IO subsystem at the time it could cause this.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 3, 2011 at 10:15 am
The Dixie Flatline (11/3/2011)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 3, 2011 at 10:11 am
Ok, but that doesn't tell us anything useful. You're going to have to dig in further if you want to investigate this.
sys.dm_os_waiting_tasks, sys.dm_os_wait_stats are the two DMVs to start with...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 3, 2011 at 9:44 am
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143504.aspx
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 3, 2011 at 9:33 am
What's the wait type? What's the wait resource?
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 3, 2011 at 9:30 am
Artoo22 (11/3/2011)
I ran each one twice in succession.
I was generating the execution plan.
I have run the same test with execution...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 3, 2011 at 9:26 am
Omar Ismail (11/3/2011)
Therefore, my answer to you is NEVER, especially in today’s production environment, where SMALL is not in the dictionary.
Unfortunately this is wrong. I can easily conjure an example...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 3, 2011 at 9:23 am
The recommendation is per-instance. The fact that there are multiple instances on the server don't make the slightest difference to the number of files a tempDB should have.
If all...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 3, 2011 at 7:50 am
Absolutely. These days anyone running 32 bit SQL or OS needs a really good reason why. Even desktops are going full 64-bit (I've been running only 64-bit OS on my...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 3, 2011 at 7:32 am
dva2007 (11/3/2011)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 3, 2011 at 7:20 am
jspatz (11/3/2011)
Best practice states you should add as many data files to your tempdb as their are cores in the server...
Nope
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 3, 2011 at 7:16 am
Not offhand.
Second execution (so not incurring data caching), execution plan off when you pulled those IO and time stats?
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 3, 2011 at 7:02 am
ankita.patel01 81294 (11/3/2011)
This is not bringing back expected result or the expected row count back.
That's not going to help anyone fix the code...
What's it doing wrong? What should the queries...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 3, 2011 at 6:57 am
120 000 reads for the seek vs 20 000 for the scan. Pretty clear why SQL chooses a scan here.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 3, 2011 at 6:55 am
Viewing 15 posts - 22,531 through 22,545 (of 49,552 total)