Viewing 15 posts - 22,381 through 22,395 (of 49,552 total)
If the client app is the cause, yes.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 9, 2011 at 9:53 am
codebyo (11/9/2011)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 9, 2011 at 9:50 am
SQLRNNR (11/9/2011)
GilaMonster (11/9/2011)
Roy Ernest (11/9/2011)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 9, 2011 at 9:47 am
Roy Ernest (11/9/2011)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 9, 2011 at 9:34 am
Async network IO is usually a result of a client app that's slow to receive or process the resultset from SQL Server.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 9, 2011 at 9:34 am
nicholasr 68909 (11/9/2011)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 9, 2011 at 9:28 am
Taggs (11/9/2011)
Hmm, I'm a little confused. Although the file still has the data (which I thought it had cleared) that portion is now reusable?
Yup. Nothing's actually cleared when a log...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 9, 2011 at 9:21 am
HowardW (11/9/2011)
Just for fun, for the original OR statement I get a seek on a range with this example in 2008:
Yes, the original OR you will, because in that it's...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 9, 2011 at 9:17 am
HowardW (11/9/2011)
GSquared (11/9/2011)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 9, 2011 at 8:31 am
Ninja's_RGR'us (11/9/2011)
-Syd- (11/9/2011)
The report was working correct!! Just went wrong a few minutes ago!
It's an intermittant error.
You can be 100% certain it will happen again. It's just a matter...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 9, 2011 at 8:30 am
In that case, this link does apply. http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2009/03/19/catch-all-queries/
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 9, 2011 at 8:23 am
Taggs (11/9/2011)
My understanding is that when I take a SQL Full backup my log files are cleared out (NOT SHRUNK) and new trans log data is saved.
No. Full backups don't...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 9, 2011 at 8:22 am
-Syd- (11/9/2011)
"Msg 601, Level 12, State 3, Line 470
Could not continue scan with NOLOCK due to data movement."
Im using "SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED;"...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 9, 2011 at 8:06 am
Edit: Sorry, I thought the param was the one with the IS NULL check
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 9, 2011 at 8:03 am
Ninja's_RGR'us (11/9/2011)
Am I the only 1 who wants to answer... if you don't know that, then why are you teaching this stuff??http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1202806-150-1.aspx
Haven't you forgotten the old saying - 'Those who...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 9, 2011 at 7:54 am
Viewing 15 posts - 22,381 through 22,395 (of 49,552 total)