Viewing 15 posts - 1,606 through 1,620 (of 49,552 total)
Don't think so, DBCC Show_Statistics does.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
March 30, 2017 at 4:22 am
Yes. On very small tables it'll be sample 100%, as the size goes up the sample % goes down.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
March 30, 2017 at 3:51 am
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
March 29, 2017 at 3:25 pm
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
March 29, 2017 at 3:01 pm
Yes, but a cluster with all services, and trying to merge failover cluster and AG (and I don't even think you can do that), is a really bad idea. Overloaded,...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
March 29, 2017 at 2:56 pm
Someone who knows more than me about clustering, please weigh in?
https://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/1867482/2016-Cluster-Questions-For-Always-On-but-also-with-other-services
What he's thinking sounds like a bad idea, and if I saw a client...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
March 29, 2017 at 2:53 pm
So if we reduce the memory , say SQL is...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
March 29, 2017 at 2:51 pm
No, because it makes no sense to have it like that, it's likely to cause problems when the cluster fails over. Create more virtual machines and separate them out
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
March 29, 2017 at 11:12 am
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
March 29, 2017 at 9:31 am
Thom A - Wednesday, March 29, 2017 8:31 AMToo optimistic? 🙂
Yes.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
March 29, 2017 at 8:42 am
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
March 29, 2017 at 8:27 am
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
March 29, 2017 at 8:22 am
Can you post the whole query? Because out of context it doesn't mean all that much (and is missing a bracket)
Which of the functions don't you understand?
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
March 29, 2017 at 8:10 am
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
March 29, 2017 at 6:05 am
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
March 29, 2017 at 5:09 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,606 through 1,620 (of 49,552 total)