Viewing 15 posts - 1,231 through 1,245 (of 4,745 total)
good question I think. Reminds people of the function (or brings it to their attention for the first time) so its educational, but steve put a little twist in it...
January 11, 2012 at 10:46 am
I would surmise 3MB was its default size.
January 11, 2012 at 7:43 am
Interesting, thanks for posting that back.
Just curious, if you did still use truncateonly (naughty 🙂 ), what did the file shrink to?
January 11, 2012 at 6:42 am
I would not expect it to give the error you see, but anyway the truncateonly option has no effect when applied to a log shrink
I have used this script...
January 11, 2012 at 3:20 am
I would not expect it to give the error you see, but anyway the truncateonly option has no effect when applied to a log shrink
January 10, 2012 at 3:29 pm
that figure you remember of 10 databases on a 32bit server sounds like how many databases you can MIRROR on one server.
Even that is not a hard and fast...
January 10, 2012 at 6:51 am
definitely no.
SQL browser should be running when you have multiple instances
January 10, 2012 at 6:45 am
have you ticked the 'include updates' box?
January 10, 2012 at 6:21 am
There seem to be more sites out there that say the SMK gets created when it is needed to encrypt another key, including technet. However there are also some that...
January 9, 2012 at 1:05 pm
thanks for posting that back.
One thing I forgot to mention it would now be worth defragmenting your indexes as the move about of the data is likely to have fragmented...
January 9, 2012 at 7:59 am
If the data is truly read only then I have no qualms with not backing up that data less frequently.
sorry, what? 🙂
January 8, 2012 at 4:26 pm
note : 7 year old thread last posted to 3 and a half years ago - I highly recommend you post your question in a new thread (i.e add a...
January 7, 2012 at 4:59 pm
just to be different, if the data is not changing, I would probably go for weekly. Why waste the resources (including tape) if the data is not changing?
January 6, 2012 at 10:41 am
If your failover site is for high availability or DR purposes and you don't require access to the failover database in normal circumstances I would never recommend replication as the...
January 6, 2012 at 6:16 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,231 through 1,245 (of 4,745 total)