Viewing 15 posts - 1,201 through 1,215 (of 4,745 total)
ERIC CRUDELI (1/19/2012)
log file 2Go
?
January 19, 2012 at 6:56 am
If the no is large I would shrink the log right down and then grow it manually in 8000MB chunks to your desired size.
January 19, 2012 at 6:52 am
thats a high number. How big is the log?
I would recommend scheduling an outage to shrink the log right down then grow it again in sensibly sized chunks.
see http://www.sqlskills.com/BLOGS/KIMBERLY/post/Transaction-Log-VLFs-too-many-or-too-few.aspx
January 19, 2012 at 6:46 am
Probably the number of vlfs in the log file, excessive numbers slow recovery.
run dbcc loginfo(yourdbname)
and see how many rows returned, thats how many vlfs you have
January 19, 2012 at 6:33 am
the no. of vlfs is very possibly the cause for the slow recovery. Reducing the number should help.
If the no is large I would shrink the log right down and...
January 19, 2012 at 6:28 am
any errors from the log restore job?
any evidence in the errorlog of logs being restored?
what does query
select * from msdb..log_shipping_monitor_secondary
say about last copied and restored files?
January 18, 2012 at 7:23 am
GilaMonster (1/17/2012)
ragresti-1141020 (1/17/2012)
This way there would only be one log backup to restore in the event of failure.
No, there won't be just one log backup to restore. You'll have just...
January 17, 2012 at 9:23 am
storing them in msdb keeps your SSIS packages together with your other SQL objects, it also means you have a ready made backup mechanism for the packages as long as...
January 16, 2012 at 3:38 pm
The only thing that I can think of which is no big deal is Database ID's would be different if I do not attach them in the same order then...
January 14, 2012 at 2:15 pm
see the FAQ here
which version of the security patch you apply depends on the version of SQL you are patched up to - you want the GDR, not the QFE
January 13, 2012 at 9:23 am
GilaMonster (1/13/2012)
Dev (1/13/2012)
I understand it. My point is shrinking the log will be more effective after log truncation.
Maybe, assuming that truncation was necessary and that said truncation...
January 13, 2012 at 9:20 am
the OP may need to back up the log as well, but I would not expect active log in a read only database,
but either way the log cannot be shrunk...
January 13, 2012 at 9:18 am
Definitely. But if you are applying directly after SP4 apply the GDR version - 2494120
January 13, 2012 at 9:15 am
truncate the log file means remove the inactive portion of the log, it does not physically shrink the size of the log file on the drive, only a shrink command...
January 13, 2012 at 9:04 am
Dev (1/13/2012)
Transaction Log Backups should do the trick (assuming database is in FULL recovery model).
sorry Dev, that won't make the files any smaller.
January 13, 2012 at 8:45 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,201 through 1,215 (of 4,745 total)