Viewing 15 posts - 1,201 through 1,215 (of 4,745 total)
ERIC CRUDELI (1/19/2012)
log file 2Go
?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
January 19, 2012 at 6:56 am
If the no is large I would shrink the log right down and then grow it manually in 8000MB chunks to your desired size.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
January 19, 2012 at 6:52 am
thats a high number. How big is the log?
I would recommend scheduling an outage to shrink the log right down then grow it again in sensibly sized chunks.
see http://www.sqlskills.com/BLOGS/KIMBERLY/post/Transaction-Log-VLFs-too-many-or-too-few.aspx
---------------------------------------------------------------------
January 19, 2012 at 6:46 am
Probably the number of vlfs in the log file, excessive numbers slow recovery.
run dbcc loginfo(yourdbname)
and see how many rows returned, thats how many vlfs you have
---------------------------------------------------------------------
January 19, 2012 at 6:33 am
the no. of vlfs is very possibly the cause for the slow recovery. Reducing the number should help.
If the no is large I would shrink the log right down and...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
January 19, 2012 at 6:28 am
any errors from the log restore job?
any evidence in the errorlog of logs being restored?
what does query
select * from msdb..log_shipping_monitor_secondary
say about last copied and restored files?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
January 18, 2012 at 7:23 am
GilaMonster (1/17/2012)
ragresti-1141020 (1/17/2012)
This way there would only be one log backup to restore in the event of failure.
No, there won't be just one log backup to restore. You'll have just...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
January 17, 2012 at 9:23 am
storing them in msdb keeps your SSIS packages together with your other SQL objects, it also means you have a ready made backup mechanism for the packages as long as...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
January 16, 2012 at 3:38 pm
The only thing that I can think of which is no big deal is Database ID's would be different if I do not attach them in the same order then...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
January 14, 2012 at 2:15 pm
see the FAQ here
which version of the security patch you apply depends on the version of SQL you are patched up to - you want the GDR, not the QFE
---------------------------------------------------------------------
January 13, 2012 at 9:23 am
GilaMonster (1/13/2012)
Dev (1/13/2012)
I understand it. My point is shrinking the log will be more effective after log truncation.
Maybe, assuming that truncation was necessary and that said truncation...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
January 13, 2012 at 9:20 am
the OP may need to back up the log as well, but I would not expect active log in a read only database,
but either way the log cannot be shrunk...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
January 13, 2012 at 9:18 am
Definitely. But if you are applying directly after SP4 apply the GDR version - 2494120
---------------------------------------------------------------------
January 13, 2012 at 9:15 am
truncate the log file means remove the inactive portion of the log, it does not physically shrink the size of the log file on the drive, only a shrink command...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
January 13, 2012 at 9:04 am
Dev (1/13/2012)
Transaction Log Backups should do the trick (assuming database is in FULL recovery model).
sorry Dev, that won't make the files any smaller.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
January 13, 2012 at 8:45 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,201 through 1,215 (of 4,745 total)