Viewing 15 posts - 4,411 through 4,425 (of 4,745 total)
Jeff, hi. This is the code the vendors sent thru for the delete which just does not perform and I hope can be improved upon
delete from T1
from AssociationLinks T1, AssociationLinks...
May 17, 2008 at 2:31 am
yep, that sounds the most likely. a big enough database and judicious use of dbcc sqlperf(logspace) could prove it.
May 16, 2008 at 12:33 pm
rhlangley (5/16/2008)
May 16, 2008 at 12:19 pm
maybe in 2005 log backups that occur whilst full backup is running don't truncate the log?
little hamsters writing it all down more likely though.......
May 15, 2008 at 6:16 am
you are the DBA, he's the network admin, end of story. I would not let a network admin, or anyone else, any where near my backup jobs.
If its your responsibility...
May 14, 2008 at 3:44 pm
how about
select db_name() --returns dbname of current database
or db_name(dbid) will return dbname for that dbid
see BOL
May 14, 2008 at 3:38 pm
In SQL 2000 log and full backups were mutually exclusive. I would say this is because the full backup process works by just dumping out the extents in the database...
May 14, 2008 at 3:24 am
you're not an oracle shop just getting into SQL are you? This sounds like a suggestion from someone used to Oracles multiple schemas in a database to effectively give multiple...
May 10, 2008 at 5:46 pm
Marios,
I think your mistake was physically moving the tempdb files manually. Just ensure the new directory structure exists (actually if they don't alter database will fail), run alter database and...
May 9, 2008 at 1:45 pm
Hi people,
it was the dynaminc sql causing the loop to be wrapped in an outer transaction, causing the whole thing to roll back when cancelled.
I put the actual delete statement...
May 9, 2008 at 5:47 am
Karl Hewlett (5/8/2008)
HiThanks for the reply George. Its a beautiful day down here, winter has started though ...
spring just sprung here , glorious weather, 25 centigrade, more like...
May 8, 2008 at 4:17 pm
in case there is anyone else out there who would rather their proccache was not cleared down just because they restored a log backup, the connect suggestion has moved to:
https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=342832
May 8, 2008 at 3:54 pm
Karl,
Hi, hows the weather down there?
I see only two reasons for going for multiple instances, security issues and apps needing to run at different release levels. I guess you have...
May 8, 2008 at 3:39 pm
not directly because the restore will overwrite whatever is already there if database already exists and a restore does not use model database.
Not sure how restore is done (via EM,...
May 8, 2008 at 8:13 am
george sibbald (5/7/2008)
how about add the NT roles to db_datareader in model database then this set up will be in every db created in the instance....
so have you tried...
May 8, 2008 at 7:48 am
Viewing 15 posts - 4,411 through 4,425 (of 4,745 total)