Viewing 15 posts - 4,306 through 4,320 (of 4,745 total)
is the instance also 9.00.3042?
July 11, 2008 at 7:20 am
gail, intersting news, thanks, I will hold off too.
rod, does @@version return 2273 after you install?
July 11, 2008 at 3:43 am
forget that silly overcomplicated RDBMS, Oracle, SQL server much easier.
see this article:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314546
also read up on sp_help_revlogin
to set a database read only - alter database dbname set read_only
July 10, 2008 at 1:31 pm
couple of golden rules
1) if you don't ask, you don't get
2) there are two times when you are most likely to get a raise - when you join a...
July 10, 2008 at 1:24 pm
why not keep it as a database, change its name and make it read only as it will only be used for reporting. Move it to the new server using...
July 10, 2008 at 1:18 pm
check the log produced by the install for errors:
%PROGRAMFILES%\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Setup Bootstrap\LOG\Hotfix
If this patch has a tendency to fail would sure like to know about it.Were you able to back...
July 10, 2008 at 1:11 pm
Buxton69 (7/10/2008)
its cumulative
It's...
July 10, 2008 at 10:10 am
If you are at 2039 (sp4) then you are applying the GDR which will apply all fixes up to and including 2273, patches are always cumulative unless its specifically designated...
July 10, 2008 at 7:57 am
are you connected locallty to the server or logged on remotely as a client? if the latter differences in version level of SSMS can cause this
July 10, 2008 at 7:50 am
jscii,
its hard to be 100% sure because theres a lot of info there and can't see the wood for the trees. I get the impression patch is not for windows...
July 10, 2008 at 6:53 am
well, looks like a done deal, so good luck. If you get performance problems make sure vmware admin is involved as well and its not just dumped on the 'database'....
July 10, 2008 at 3:34 am
thanks guys. I'll check both out. gsquared, any info on what to search for on the MS site?
July 9, 2008 at 9:28 am
its an either\or depending on your exact version of SQL (run select @@version), and compare that to the table in the FAQ section in
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms08-040.mspx
July 9, 2008 at 9:05 am
Sharon,
I got the impression you were moving off the prod databases and leaving the dev databases on the existing machine. I dont know how powerful your existing machine is but...
July 9, 2008 at 7:52 am
Viewing 15 posts - 4,306 through 4,320 (of 4,745 total)