Viewing 15 posts - 3,976 through 3,990 (of 4,745 total)
Rob Symonds (1/12/2009)
... be prepared to be unpopular with the wrong people!
In my experience it's not a matter of having a good argument. You can talk X + Y...
January 12, 2009 at 8:47 am
is it just me or is this thread not appearing in 'active threads' or 'my posts'?
January 12, 2009 at 7:58 am
SQLBOT (1/12/2009)
Andy Steinke (1/12/2009)
Your organization needs to suppoort saying no; it's easy to say this from an ivory tower perspective but you have to have management and executive support.
This is...
January 12, 2009 at 7:53 am
If you are asking is it worthwhile using this tool then yes it is.
If this application is already up and running on an existing server and you plan to migrate...
January 12, 2009 at 4:10 am
I would do the database name change AFTER the upgrade, particularly if this is a side by side upgrade, as it would make the backout procedure easier.
January 12, 2009 at 3:59 am
Craig, interesting article, particularly the just say no and passing on problems bit. As we all know when there are performance problems the database always gets blamed first, so having...
January 12, 2009 at 3:47 am
Jon,
does this help:
http://decoding.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/how-to-install-sql-server-2005-on-windows-server-2008/
potentially you need HF KB950636
I would really expect SQL 2005 to run on windows 2008, both are current supported versions.
January 11, 2009 at 4:16 pm
Not sure I am totally clear on what you are trying to do, your error does not seem to tie in with what you are trying to do. I have...
January 11, 2009 at 2:09 pm
Jon (1/11/2009)
Well, the version reads Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Evaluation Edition: Trial Experience for IT Professionals, which I downloaded from http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=6931fa7f-c094-49a2-a050-2d07993566ec&displaylang=en&Hash=EvEc2YKUF5M9Ad8yxSpStv4ztHZ1XFSCGpO0uOkVyDmGCYxfvdN2eVZY2FacP7hPd8M0m8%2bVwG2K%2bAZmZa4kaA%3d%3d#filelist#filelist
yep, looks correct. Was there an option to...
January 11, 2009 at 12:26 pm
you don't have a clean backup of your corrupted database you can restore? Usually first resort when fixing a corruption.
If you want to 'synch' the databases with both instances up...
January 11, 2009 at 12:23 pm
Jon (1/11/2009)
January 11, 2009 at 11:54 am
The backout process is also easier with the backup\restore method. You can also make the DB read only before you back up.
January 11, 2009 at 10:51 am
If you have a lot of logins defined use the sp_help_revlogin to transfer the logins, by far the best method as you don't have to resynch them afterwards, and it...
January 11, 2009 at 10:39 am
have you checked to see if any blocking is going on? that could lead to time-outs.
January 10, 2009 at 4:19 pm
Dugi, see this:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190940(SQL.90).aspx
the resource database could be said to be more important than master as it contains all the system objects. SQL won't work without either of them anyway.
Why can't...
January 10, 2009 at 1:56 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 3,976 through 3,990 (of 4,745 total)