Viewing 15 posts - 2,701 through 2,715 (of 4,745 total)
Paul White NZ (4/7/2010)
David Fulton-420388 (4/7/2010)
Paul White NZ (4/7/2010)
David Fulton-420388 (4/7/2010)
April 7, 2010 at 7:13 am
george sibbald (4/7/2010)
David Fulton-420388 (4/7/2010)
April 7, 2010 at 7:05 am
David Fulton-420388 (4/7/2010)
April 7, 2010 at 6:52 am
What are you trying to do? You should not need to touch this database in SQL2008, and certainly don't rename it.
April 7, 2010 at 6:39 am
Perry Whittle (4/7/2010)
george sibbald (4/7/2010)
Question I don't know the answer to............In SQL2008 if you restore a master database from a different server and the server the backup originated from had...
April 7, 2010 at 5:53 am
I guess my concerns with this approach are as much about restoring master across servers per se as the different drive layout.
another issue you could hit would be around...
April 7, 2010 at 4:37 am
David BAFFALEUF (4/6/2010)
Just a quick word,
In SQL 2008 resource is not requested to be under the same location as master anymore. The resource files are stored in the binaries directory,...
April 7, 2010 at 4:31 am
Most Odd.
What is the value of the database_version column in msdb..backupset for each of these backups you are trying to restore?
April 6, 2010 at 6:20 am
I agree with Jason, that is not a SQL2000 backup you are trying to restore, as shown by the version nos in the error message.
Its telling you this backup is...
April 5, 2010 at 4:56 pm
Perry Whittle (4/5/2010)
george sibbald (4/2/2010)
sys.master_files possibly points to a bunch of file locations that don't exist so user databases will have to be dropped and reattached.
you can also perform a...
April 5, 2010 at 2:57 pm
just disable all the logshipping jobs. Do your restore on primary and restore with norecovery on secondary.
delete all tran log backups on the secondary. Move any log backups on primary...
April 5, 2010 at 10:40 am
nikhil.verma (4/4/2010)
In my Environment there is no high availability solution implemented.
In SP3 + CU1 do we get any benefits from Database administration point of...
April 4, 2010 at 4:43 am
bigM (4/3/2010)
A question from my side is that if SP3 CU1 has SP2 CU10 and CU11, then how can we add the SP2 CU12 to CU17 after the SP3...
April 4, 2010 at 4:38 am
9.0.3353 appears to be SP2 + CU16 + some individual hotfix?
Are you applying CUs simply because they are being released or because you have hit an issue fixed in CU16?...
April 3, 2010 at 5:15 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 2,701 through 2,715 (of 4,745 total)