Viewing 15 posts - 2,536 through 2,550 (of 4,745 total)
yes it would fail as the lsns would be out of synch.
there is nothing you can do to avoid this if you have to restore your primary database
May 26, 2010 at 1:29 pm
in the error log at startup does it say
Set AWE Enabled to 1 in the configuration parameters to allow use of more memory.
or
Address Windowing Extensions is enabled. This is an...
May 26, 2010 at 9:10 am
nothing comes to mind. Did checkdb come up clean?
May 25, 2010 at 2:42 pm
use DMF sys_dm_io_virtual_file_stats, it will give you info on IO activity per database file. good for seeing where the load is.
this replaced fn_virtualfilestats() in SQL2000, which still works though.
May 25, 2010 at 10:41 am
Interesting. the two types we have used, EMC and IBM, the drives themselves are not visible on the server. Hence no need to license.
I take it your database are read...
May 25, 2010 at 7:33 am
the databases are inaccesible with SAN mirroring also. You don't need to license this server as it is purely for failover.
May 25, 2010 at 7:04 am
reindexing operations can cause this behaviour. Be warned if you switch to full recovery mode whatever the process was will no longer be minimally logged, so you will end up...
May 24, 2010 at 4:05 pm
the two types of (synchronous) SAN mirroring I have done the disks are not visible on the passive server, so I do not see how this would work.
you should probably...
May 24, 2010 at 6:58 am
the disadvantage of installing on different servers (other than cost) is the network traffic.
In these days of 64bit and multi GB RAM keeping them together makes more and more sense...
May 24, 2010 at 6:50 am
for the benefit of others who might get the same problem ,how?
May 23, 2010 at 11:24 am
All new databases are created from the model database, so you would add these objects to model.
As for the data, seems a bit of a silly question to me. If...
May 23, 2010 at 5:01 am
presuming all else has been done as described above to get SQL to us it after you enable the AWE sp_configure option use
reconfigure with override
not just reconfigure
then bounce SQL
May 22, 2010 at 4:29 am
no, they are not mutually exclusive.
giving db_owner + all others or sa + all others does no harm in itself so I guess MS see no need to protect people...
May 21, 2010 at 1:12 pm
oops, sorry missed the part about the native backup.
Still run a DBCC, it will highlight any problems in the log file.
so the log must be full and growing?
May 21, 2010 at 1:00 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 2,536 through 2,550 (of 4,745 total)