Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 1,179 total)
If you have tested and result set are giving correct output than you can keep the upgraded version of the database i.e. 110 elase you can change it back to...
June 10, 2014 at 4:02 am
Rebuild the index or drop and recreat index for object id 60 and run DBCC CHECKDB to verify.
June 10, 2014 at 12:24 am
As there are 1 TB data suggested to avoid any constraints on the table. e.g. foreignkey, check constraints, indexes etc. This will speed up the process. You can do the...
June 9, 2014 at 6:24 am
Repeted but OK. Thanks for the question.
June 9, 2014 at 5:28 am
My approach is similar to Hansi. If you do have enough disk space and shrink is only 5 GB just let it be.
June 6, 2014 at 2:58 am
It will be difficult unless you are tracking the changes.
June 6, 2014 at 12:17 am
What if once user has version 1.1/1.2 and switch back to 1.0 or user use their login on old version 1.0 after he used higher verison? How data consistency maintained?
June 6, 2014 at 12:09 am
Hello Saikat,
Pl. do not post the duplicate thread on the multiple places. It will creat confusion and difficult to track the thread.
Cheers.
June 6, 2014 at 12:03 am
Refer following link might help:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11278114/enable-remote-connections-for-sql-server-express-2012
HTH
June 5, 2014 at 11:59 pm
Are you perfroming the restore on the server is having same version of SQL Server?
June 5, 2014 at 12:23 am
Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 1,179 total)