Viewing 15 posts - 5,461 through 5,475 (of 6,034 total)
cengland0 (7/26/2011)
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (7/26/2011)
I supposed you could set up the same hardware, same data set...
July 26, 2011 at 4:30 pm
Jeff Moden (7/25/2011)
But, for troubleshooting, it's sometimes very helpful and can...
July 26, 2011 at 4:14 pm
DIB IN (7/25/2011)
How to estimate table size where row length is more than 8096?
Clustered vs. Heap, fill factor, fragmentation, and several other factors may influence how the actual size of...
July 26, 2011 at 3:11 pm
cengland0 (7/26/2011)
Revenant (7/26/2011)
cengland0 (7/26/2011)
July 26, 2011 at 11:16 am
Efficient relational database design is about constraints, normalization, and discrete data types. The problem faced by companies like FaceBook is not that their databases are large or that they have...
July 26, 2011 at 9:11 am
Jo Pattyn (7/25/2011)
July 26, 2011 at 8:05 am
If your intent is to generate unique integer values for use as a surrogate keys, then I'd reccomend IDENTITY over some function that returns a random number. An identity value...
July 25, 2011 at 2:14 pm
Chrissy321 (7/24/2011)
I have a requirement to build a user interface that will allow end users to generate and issue UPDATE statements. I am fairly certain I need dynamic SQL...
July 25, 2011 at 1:54 pm
With Outlook 2007, I can create "Search Folders", which are sort of like views my inbox. If an email is addressed specifically to me, or specific team members are in...
July 25, 2011 at 12:13 pm
The obvious requirements for a "SQL Server Developer" would be to know relational database concepts and how to write SQL. Start with a book on generic RDMS theory, data modeling,...
July 25, 2011 at 9:17 am
I suspect there is something in the other four databases that reference the CONFIG database. Trying running a SQL Profiler trace filtered on the database object CONFIG, and then have...
July 25, 2011 at 8:55 am
Reading email doesn't necessarily have to involve preemptive multi-tasking. The developer can read and reply as they come in, or he can just let them queue up for a couple...
July 25, 2011 at 8:43 am
drew.allen (7/22/2011)
Eric M Russell (7/21/2011)
SQL_By_Chance (7/21/2011)
July 22, 2011 at 8:23 am
GilaMonster (7/21/2011)
Eric M Russell (7/21/2011)
When in doubt, then use LEFT JOIN.. WHERE.. IS NULL, because it will scale better for very large rowsets.http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2010/04/27/in-exists-and-join-a-roundup/
In my experience, a large table is...
July 22, 2011 at 8:05 am
IRK (7/19/2011)
I prepared same query in following 3 ways
1) using NOT IN
2) using LEFT JOIN WITH NULL
3) using NOT EXISTS
then the Query cost is same i.e., 33%,33%,33%
at last...
July 21, 2011 at 3:52 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 5,461 through 5,475 (of 6,034 total)