Viewing 15 posts - 4,441 through 4,455 (of 6,041 total)
sql-lover (8/8/2014)
"Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Instead, seek what they sought." - Matsuo Basho
August 8, 2014 at 1:24 pm
GPO (8/7/2014)
"Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Instead, seek what they sought." - Matsuo Basho
August 7, 2014 at 2:44 pm
Gary Varga (8/7/2014)
Eric M Russell (8/7/2014)
Miles Neale (8/7/2014)
Eric M Russell (8/7/2014)
The Fault (8/7/2014)
Eric M Russell (8/7/2014)
"Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Instead, seek what they sought." - Matsuo Basho
August 7, 2014 at 2:35 pm
Miles Neale (8/7/2014)
Eric M Russell (8/7/2014)
The Fault (8/7/2014)
Eric M Russell (8/7/2014)
"Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Instead, seek what they sought." - Matsuo Basho
August 7, 2014 at 11:33 am
The Fault (8/7/2014)
Eric M Russell (8/7/2014)
"Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Instead, seek what they sought." - Matsuo Basho
August 7, 2014 at 11:04 am
Staging a high transaction volume OLTP environment for QA and performance testing is actually much harder than a data warehouse environment. Data Warehouses tend to be static with fewer users....
"Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Instead, seek what they sought." - Matsuo Basho
August 7, 2014 at 9:01 am
smtzac (8/7/2014)
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[ABCD](
[A] [uniqueidentifier] NULL,
[uniqueidentifier] NULL,
[C] [nvarchar](100) NULL,
[D] [nvarchar](max) NULL,
[E] [nvarchar](max)...
"Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Instead, seek what they sought." - Matsuo Basho
August 7, 2014 at 8:03 am
Recently I thought of something that had never previously crossed my mind: what about purposely testing against a database with fragmented indexes as may exist in a production database? Is...
"Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Instead, seek what they sought." - Matsuo Basho
August 7, 2014 at 6:32 am
Try the following:
RANK() OVER (ORDER BY Col1, Col2, Col3)
Notice it's using rank() instead of row_number() and no partition by.
"Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Instead, seek what they sought." - Matsuo Basho
August 6, 2014 at 9:51 am
A long running select query may temporarily block a stored procedure attempting an update, insert, or delete on same table. The opposite can also be true, an update transaction held...
"Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Instead, seek what they sought." - Matsuo Basho
August 6, 2014 at 9:47 am
Consult with the team and consider all the potential routes by which records are inserted into this table. For example, is it always inserted via the application, or is there...
"Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Instead, seek what they sought." - Matsuo Basho
August 5, 2014 at 7:30 am
One approach is to creating your sorted country list is to query whatever transactional table would contain country code. For performance to be acceptable, it's essential that whatever columns you're...
"Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Instead, seek what they sought." - Matsuo Basho
August 5, 2014 at 7:16 am
paul.j.kemna (8/4/2014)
I also occasionally use LEN(Fields!FieldName.Value) > 0)...
"Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Instead, seek what they sought." - Matsuo Basho
August 4, 2014 at 11:06 am
paul.j.kemna (8/4/2014)
"Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Instead, seek what they sought." - Matsuo Basho
August 4, 2014 at 7:46 am
Creating a non-clustered index containing all columns makes no sense. If you create a clustered index on a table, then technically you already have an index that covers all columns....
"Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Instead, seek what they sought." - Matsuo Basho
August 4, 2014 at 7:06 am
Viewing 15 posts - 4,441 through 4,455 (of 6,041 total)