Viewing 15 posts - 556 through 570 (of 4,272 total)
90 days. good deal. I haven't seen that printed yet..
I try not to go to enterprise unless I need to, basically due to costs. But if you need...
February 22, 2012 at 7:44 am
We'd love to hear back..
And the AWE setting in 64 bit is effectively ignored, not sure why its even there in that edition, probably backwards compatibility.
If you set it to...
February 22, 2012 at 7:42 am
I'm going to pile on what Gila and Lowell have said.
STOP RESTARTING SQL..
Unless you have other software installed you have effectively set aside 14GB for the OS and SQL performance...
February 22, 2012 at 7:16 am
I would say that they are inter-related. SSRS and SSIS are components of the BI suite for MS SQL Server..
CEWII
February 21, 2012 at 9:54 pm
handkot (2/21/2012)
select @@VERSIONMicrosoft SQL Server 2008 (SP3) - 10.0.5500.0 (X64) Sep 21 2011 22:45:45 Copyright (c) 1988-2008 Microsoft Corporation Enterprise Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT...
February 21, 2012 at 9:44 pm
calvo (2/21/2012)
February 21, 2012 at 9:35 pm
I think you need to understand the cluster quorum settings because for a three node cluster the only way to allow a 2 of 3 failure is the No Majority...
February 21, 2012 at 9:31 pm
I'm saying that you could have the new nodes and the old nodes as part of the cluster at the same time. What matters is the number of machines...
February 21, 2012 at 2:50 pm
I'm a little worried that you fundamentally don't know about max memory in SQL. As said above SQL will use ALL the memory it wants if you don't expressly...
February 21, 2012 at 2:32 pm
At a high level I believe it will work. I don't believe the nodes have to be evicted from the cluster for it to work just that SQL Standard...
February 21, 2012 at 2:26 pm
My first thought was a name resolution problem..
CEWII
February 16, 2012 at 1:48 pm
Service Broker sounds like a good alternative.. Fire and forget..
I try VERY hard to limit the use of linked server, I used to use them often.. ...
February 16, 2012 at 10:02 am
SQLKnowItAll (2/14/2012)
February 14, 2012 at 3:28 pm
That makes sense devin.. I believe the order of precedence is:
1. design-time values
2. run-time startup values
3. config values (files, SQL, environment, etc.)
4. execution values
CEWII
February 14, 2012 at 3:02 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 556 through 570 (of 4,272 total)