Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 251 total)
HanShi (8/12/2008)
@Chirag: on the internet I've found "Min_active_rowversion() was introduced in SP2 for SQL Server 2005".
That's all well and good, but the question doesn't say "In SQL Server 2005, what...
August 12, 2008 at 6:47 am
...and, if you pass the data in as XML (or whatever other method you choose to pass in a chunk of data that you want to work on) then you...
April 16, 2008 at 6:54 am
You don't need a trigger...
[font="Courier New"]DECLARE
@UserId UNIQUEIDENTIFIER,
@GroupID UNIQUEIDENTIFIER
SET @user-id = NEWID()
SET @GroupID = NEWID()
INSERT INTO User_Group_Map (UserID, GroupID) VALUES (@UserID, @GroupID)[/font]
Wrap it in a stored proc and you can use...
April 16, 2008 at 6:49 am
Here's another vote for "squeal". Been working with a very difficult system lately.
And you know the SCSI interface? It had to have been designed by geeks and not marketing, otherwise...
April 11, 2008 at 7:19 am
One thing I find useful is to first see if the vendor of the tool has any suggested standards. It appears that Microsoft offers little guidance in that regard, for...
March 3, 2008 at 7:47 am
If all you want to do is execute a stored proc that returns no results then you don't need a DataAdapter/DataSet (you don't necessarily need one even if you do...
February 29, 2008 at 7:31 am
Eric Wilson (2/18/2008)
February 18, 2008 at 11:02 am
Wow, sorry for the multiple posts, not sure how that happened.
February 18, 2008 at 7:11 am
Eric Wilson (2/14/2008)
The only possible reason to want an ARRAY type is because of assumptions of how the data will be *physically* organized. But we should...
February 18, 2008 at 7:09 am
Eric Wilson (2/14/2008)
The only possible reason to want an ARRAY type is because of assumptions of how the data will be *physically* organized. But we should...
February 18, 2008 at 7:09 am
Eric Wilson (2/14/2008)
The only possible reason to want an ARRAY type is because of assumptions of how the data will be *physically* organized. But we should...
February 18, 2008 at 7:07 am
In C#, would something like this work? Key is setting the length of the input parameter when you create it. You didn't indicate what type @o is so I assumed...
January 22, 2008 at 7:32 am
Have you seen Log Parser? It's a free tool from Microsoft that is very useful for parsing different kinds of log files, including IIS log files. I've used it myself...
January 21, 2008 at 10:05 am
A SqlDataAdapter isn't needed if all you want is to get back the output parameter value, but specifying the command type is definitely a good idea. I bit the bullet...
November 30, 2007 at 9:05 am
Yeah, that would probably be because ExecuteNonQuery doesn't take any parameters, sorry (you can double-check that by checking on-line help).
So take out the "CommandBehavior.CloseConnection", and then be sure to add...
November 29, 2007 at 7:46 am
Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 251 total)